Chapter, Paragraph

 1  1,6 |         before the early Church; and Revelation and Acts offered patterns
 2  2,2 |           convey this corrective. As Revelation had claimed the authority
 3  2,2 |              and the two stand after Revelation in the Alexandrian manuscript
 4  2,5 |           collection that begins the Revelation, together with Hebrews,
 5  2,8 |      Testament, putting it after the Revelation and before Hermas. Jerome
 6  2,8 |        letters, between Jude and the Revelation of John. Eusebius classes
 7  2,8 |            the disputed books — the “Revelation of John,” the “Revelation
 8  2,8 |            Revelation of John,” the “Revelation of Peter,” and the “Gospel
 9  2,9 |            and the Acts and uses the Revelation of John, the Revelation
10  2,9 |              Revelation of John, the Revelation of Peter, I Peter, and probably
11  3   |             use of this style in the Revelation of John. This special kind
12  3   |          upon the publication of the Revelation of John and dealt not so
13  3   |              in the human heart. The Revelation of John was probably well
14  3   |            than we might expect. The Revelation of John is full of reflections
15  3   |              a whole province, and a revelation. No wonder Ignatius could
16  3   |              in mind.~ Direct divine revelation, or apocalyptic, was an
17  3   |   Corinthians (chap. 15).[6] But the Revelation of John, about A.D. 93,
18  3   |              also took the form of a revelation, although it was influenced
19  3   |              Kingdom of God, but the Revelation of Peter is devoted to the
20  3   |          Sisyphus and Tantalus.~ The Revelation runs somewhat as follows.
21  3   |              is also some use of the Revelation of John, which must have
22  3   |         suggested the writing of the Revelation of Peter. The day of judgment
23  3   |          found.~ Short as it is, the Revelation of Peter is full of reflections
24  3   |       language much like that in the Revelation of Peter. It is also used
25  3   |            facts fix the date of the Revelation of Peter in the quarter-century
26  3   |       between A.D. 125 and 150.~ The Revelation of Peter is first mentioned
27  3   |            where it stands after the Revelation of John, with the warning
28  3   |            Peter: “Peter says in the Revelation... “ (Prophetic Extracts
29  3   |           300, which closes with the Revelation of John, the Acts of the
30  3   |            the Acts of Paul, and the Revelation of Peter. Early in the fourth
31  3   |              fifth century, says the Revelation was read every year on Good
32  3   |             A.D. 850) it follows the Revelation of John among the disputed
33  3   |           owe much indirectly to the Revelation of Peter. There is a far-off
34  3   |             Testament.~ Although the Revelation of Peter is mentioned by
35  3   |         lists gave the length of the Revelation of Peter as from 270 (in
36  3   |          found that the whole of the Revelation of Peter was actually imbedded
37  3   |     elsewhere) was a Greek source of revelation mentioned, though with disapproval,
38  3   |            12]~ In Codex V the first revelation, which follows a fragmentary
39  3   |            of Jericho was a place of revelation. Then the boy took him to
40  3   |      Apocalypse of Adam is the final revelation recorded in the fifth codex
41  3   |  sevenhundredth year Adam gave him a revelation describing his own original
42  3   |              have misused them. This revelation is then described as “the
43  4,4 |       disputed books, along with the Revelation of John, the Revelation
44  4,4 |              Revelation of John, the Revelation of Peter and the Letter
45  4,10|        third-century Greek papyrus, “Revelation of James-Generation [genesis]
46  4,11|         books, including Hebrews and Revelation. If it comes from about
47  5,3 |          Shepherd of Hernias and the Revelation of Peter. In the Stichometry
48  5,4 |            the Fourth Gospel and the Revelation. Who the writer of these
49  5,7 |              in words drawn from the Revelation of Peter. The apostle calls
50  5,7 |        Syriac origin. Its use of the Revelation of Peter, in chapters 55-
51  6,1 |     antiphonies, and choruses of the Revelation.~ Nothing like a collection
52  6,3 |      earliest witness to the Book of Revelation, and as time went on he
53  7,1 |             Gospel of Peter, and the Revelation of Peter as not accepted
54  9,1 |            the first century, as the Revelation shows (3:1-6), and in the
55  9,1 |    scriptures), On the Devil and the Revelation of John, and finally, the
56  9,2 |         commentary of Andreas on the Revelation, had a manuscript written
57 10,2 |              I John and I Peter, the Revelation of John, and the Shepherd
58 11,3 |      Barnabas and what is called the Revelation of Peter.” It was in the
59 11,3 |             Shepherd of Hernias, the Revelation of Peter, the Preaching
60 12,7 |             I Peter, I John, and the Revelation of John-twenty-two m all.
61 13,3 |              way from Genesis to the Revelation, but lie covered very few
62 13,3 |               Song of Songs, Daniel, Revelation — usually contenting himself
63 13,3 |            Three Greek fragments~The Revelation. Some Arabic fragments~ ~
64 13,4 |             Defense ofthe Gospel and Revelation of John, probably about
65 13,4 |           little later to defend the Revelation against the claim of a Roman
66 13,4 |              had maintained that the Revelation was really written by the
67 13,8 |         Peter and I and II John. The Revelation of John completed his New
68 13,8 |             Shepherd of Hernias, the Revelation of Peter, and the Acts of
69 13,11|          earth,” and appealed to the Revelation of John in support of it.~
70 13,11|              authorship made for the Revelation. He compared its style and
71 13,11|           the same hand and that the Revelation must be figuratively understood.
72 13,11|             the doubt with which the Revelation was ever after regarded
73 14,7 |          Peter, I John and Jude, the Revelation of John, and at first the
74 14,14|             I Peter, I John, and the Revelation of John. As compared with
75 14,21|              Songs, Matthew, and the Revelation, but of these only the commentary
76 14,21|           only the commentary on the Revelation has come down to us. Jerome
77 14,21|              great commentary on the Revelation.[96]~ The commentaries of
78 14,21|             in the Commentary on the Revelation.~ Another small piece from
79 16   |            are a goodly company: the Revelation of Peter, the Apology of
80 16   |              complete Greek text~The Revelation of Peter; no complete Greek
81 16   |           text~ On the Devil and the Revelation of John; no text~ The Apology;
82 16   |              Thieves; no text~On the Revelation; no text~Against Marcion;
83 16   |             Defense ofthe Gospel and Revelation of John; no text~On the
84 16   | Revelation-Vis. iv. 2. 1-whereas the Revelation, less than half the length
85 16   |       accepted the Preaching and the Revelation of Peter as genuine and
86 16   |       Bar-Salibi’s commentary on the Revelation, written in the twelfth