Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Pref |           flourished. He wrote in Latin, and he still influences
 2 Pref |         version of the Bible, the Latin Vulgate. He wrote a short
 3  1,3 |         it spread and appeared in Latin and Syriac and, in the third
 4  1,5 |          soon in the West we have Latin writers at work simultaneously
 5  2,3 |          in 1875. One Syriac, one Latin, and two Coptic manuscripts
 6  2,3 |    prestige, its translation into Latin, Syriac, and Coptic shows
 7  2,3 |           not accompany it in the Latin and Coptic versions shows
 8  2,4 | twelfth-century manuscript with a Latin version of the “Didache,”
 9  2,4 |    Schlecht, in 1899, published a Latin document (an eleventh-century
10  2,4 |        Goodspeed argued that both Latin versions represented the
11  2,7 |        and expanded, as Greek and Latin texts show. On the other
12  2,7 |         we are dependent upon the Latin version.~Nearly sixty years
13  2,8 |         been found by itself in a Latin version. The Latin translation
14  2,8 |           in a Latin version. The Latin translation of Barnabas
15  2,9 |           it in Coptic in 1895. A Latin fragment of it, a single
16  2,9 |      these three sources, Coptic, Latin, and Ethiopic, Schmidt in
17  2,13|            especially in Rufinus' Latin version of Eusebius'. Jesus'
18  3   |    Testament and, translated into Latin, even influenced Dante,
19  3   |         us in Ethiopic and in two Latin versions (one from the second
20  3   |           again by name in an old Latin sermon of uncertain date
21  4,4 |      translated it into Greek and Latin, but it was certainly current
22  4,4 |         translated into Greek and Latin, probably meaning those
23  4,10|  manuscripts (there is no ancient Latin version) entitle it a narrative,
24  5,4 |         in other sources, chiefly Latin. John converts a philosopher,
25  5,5 |       from various sources-Greek, Latin, and Coptic. The Nicephorus
26  5,5 |         of the Acts is found in a Latin manuscript at Vercelli.
27  5,5 |  preserved in Greek as well as in Latin. Simon, who has already
28  5,6 |           it is preserved also in Latin, Ethiopic, and Armenian
29  5,8 |          of Andrew and produced a Latin epitome of them, frankly
30  5,9 |       preserved in full only in a Latin translation by Rufinus.~
31  6,2 |          one, although not in the Latin or Coptic versions of it.
32  6,2 |         it did not follow it into Latin and Coptic versions, so
33  7,1 |      passage is preserved only in Latin) when he writes that in
34  7,4 |           man named Celsus made a Latin translation of the Dialogue.
35  7,4 |         which, in either Greek or Latin, would help much toward
36  8,3 |          by Ciasca in 1888, and a Latin form of it in the Vulgate
37  8,3 |          of it was published in a Latin translation by Moesinger
38  8,3 |          version of the Fuldensis Latin and a Dutch version made
39  9,1 |            In addition, there are Latin paraphrases of the homily,[
40 10,2 |           dependent upon an early Latin translation of it, which
41 11,3 |           John, is preserved in a Latin translation by Cassiodorus,
42 12,3 |      original and only 186 in the Latin translation.~ Even more
43 12,3 |         have disappeared. Even in Latin we have lesst than half
44 12,4 |       knowledge of it upon a free Latin' translation published in
45 12,7 |       almost a rewriting of it in Latin by Rufinus. The Miscellanies,
46 12,7 |      fragments show that Rufinus' Latin translation was not as bad
47 13,2 |         of Hippolytus to light in Latin, Syriac, Coptic, Arabic,
48 13,6 |       lost, but a similar work in Latin (De Pascha computus), written
49 13,6 |      modified, in three different Latin versions, and there is also
50 13,7 |           palimpsest at Verona, a Latin form of it much nearer to
51 14   |                                   Latin Christian Writers.~
52 14,1 |                         Christian Latin.~ In the latter part of
53 14,1 |      first century the writing of Latin literature was already passing
54 14,1 |       began to be translated into Latin. It was there, and not in
55 14,1 |      there, and not in Rome, that Latin Christianity had its beginning
56 14,1 |      express itself vigorously in Latin books.~ ~
57 14,2 |         The first great figure in Latin Christianity was Tertullian,
58 14,2 |           fate is the earliest of Latin martyrdoms.~ ~
59 14,6 |          extant in both Greek and Latin and is a work of moving
60 14,6 |           different book from the Latin work of that name. Other
61 14,7 |                               The Latin Bible.~ The Latin version
62 14,7 |             The Latin Bible.~ The Latin version of the Bible was
63 14,7 |           probably both Greek and Latin. Like Irenaeus, he had a
64 14,8 |   admirabl work of another gifted Latin, the Octavius of Minucius
65 14,8 |          one of the leading pagan Latin writers of the secon century,
66 14,8 |       though less effectively, in Latin by Fronto.~ We know much
67 14,8 |          a return to the earliest Latin models; he exalted oratory
68 14,9 |           on Christianity made in Latin.~ The scene of the Octavius
69 14,10|          to do a great service to Latin Christianity in North Africa.
70 14,13|      century.~ Another famous old Latin treatise that has been ascribed
71 14,13|          that he was the earliest Latin Christian writer, but Koch
72 14,15|        was the first considerable Latin writer of the Roman church.
73 14,21|           expert in Greek then in Latin and spoke slightingly of
74 15,4 |    translations of Greek works in Latin, Syriac, Armenian, or Coptic.
75 16   |         Greek; 388 not even in th~Latin version~Commentaries; 275
76 16   |         very little pry served in Latin~On First Principles; no
77 16   |         are also preserved in two Latin manuscripts of the sixteenth
78 16   |           in the Vienna series of Latin fathers, Corpus Scriptorum