Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,2 |         History (iii. 16; iv. 23. II). Dionysius wrote to Soter,
 2  2,2 |           described by Herodotus (II. 73) and Pliny the Elder (
 3  2,2 |         Alexandria. The so-called II Clement became attached
 4  2,3 |            about A.D. 100 (Vision ii. 4. 3) ; and his letter
 5  2,3 |       Origen (On First Principles ii. 3. 6, etc.); and by Eusebius (
 6  2,3 |         period, and the fact that II Clement does not accompany
 7  2,4 |           the first half (through II:2) comes from about A.D.
 8  2,5 |        carry his letters (Philad. II:2; Smyrn. 12:1). Ignatius
 9  2,8 |         writings such as I Enoch, II Esdras, and II Baruch.~The
10  2,8 |           I Enoch, II Esdras, and II Baruch.~The Letter of Barnabas
11  2,8 |          full Greek text of I and II Clement (1875), and then
12  3   |        apocalypses known to us as II Esdras was given a Christian
13  3   |          did two letters of Paul, II Thessalonians (chap. 2)
14  3   |            The Ezra Apocalypse in II Esdras (5:33-35), written
15  3   |        apocalypses known to us as II Esdras by providing it with
16  3   |        version is extant in Codex II and, though often frag mentary,
17  4,3 |           Roman sermon we know as II Clement, but we do not know
18  4,4 |         the Hebrews (Miscellanies ii. 45; v. 96): “He will not
19  4,5 |           human form (I John 4:2; II John 7).~ On the other side,
20  4,8 |        times in his Miscellanies (ii. 9. 45; iii- 4.26; vii.
21  4,8 |   paradoseis), in I Cor. 11:2 and II Thess. 2:15, in a Christian
22  5,5 |         of Rome, as we have seen. II Peter, probably written
23  5,5 |          you have no wish to go” (II Pet. 1:14).~ A considerable
24  5,5 |            the Apology of Justin, II Peter, and probably the
25  6,2 |                                   II Clement.~ Another prominent
26  6,2 |         and Harnack to think that II Clement was probably Soter'
27  6,2 | difficulty with this view is that II Clement is not really a
28  6,2 |         Clement (23:3, 4), but in II Clement it is carried a
29  6,2 |       mentioned in Hermas (Vision ii. 3, 4). Hernias quotes from
30  6,2 |  apocrypha.[33] But, at any rate, II Clement is certainly quoting
31  6,2 |          Hermas, the link between II Clement and Rome becomes
32  6,2 |             Although the place of II Clement's origin remains
33  6,2 |           not necessarily connect II Clement with Alexandria.
34  6,2 |          Clement with Alexandria. II Clement was translated along
35  6,2 |           circulate widely before II Clement became attached
36  6,2 |         to it.~ After the time of II Clement we encounter other
37  8,4 |         scripture in Barnabas and II Clement, to look no farther.
38  9,3 |           Euphrates (To Autolycus II. 24), and indicates that
39  9,3 |         he describes as inspired (ii. 22).~ Eusebius is the first
40 10,2 |        various forms (Books I and II) but had presented the sound
41 10,2 |        and the Four Gospels (iii. II. 8) but the Acts (iii. 12.
42 10,4 |          the Jews (Church History ii. 23. 3-18). Of almost as
43 10,4 |      writers show (Church History ii. i. 3, 4; 23. 3). Neither
44 11,2 |           him (Miscellanies 1. I. II).~ It was Pantaenus who
45 11,3 |          I Peter, Jude, and I and II John, is preserved in a
46 12,7 |        New Testament, were James, II and III John, Jude, II Peter,
47 12,7 |            II and III John, Jude, II Peter, Barnabas, and the
48 12,7 |         extracts from Books I and II of the treatise Against
49 13,2 |          iv really contains Books ii and iii and part at least
50 13,8 |       letters — I Peter and I and II John. The Revelation of
51 13,8 |       Christian writer to reflect II Peter, and he must have
52 13,9 |          friendship of King Abgar II and went hunting with the
53 14,6 |          and Paul. In Books i and ii, Tertullian had dealt with
54 14,9 |           zso, and also by Xystus II, bishop of Rome, if he wrote
55 14,13|    Minucius Felix, in Parts I and II, chapters 1-9, and Tertullian'
56 14,13|           the Roman bishop Xystus II, A.D. 257-58, but most scholars
57 14,14|           Cyprian makes no use of II John. It contained the Four
58 14,15|          Harnack thinks by Xystus II, bishop of Rome, so that
59 14,17|           apology. In Books i and ii he presents Christianity,
60 14,17|      Christ's divine nature. Book ii maintains that Christ introduced
61 14,20|          to show the influence of II Maccabees, tells the fates
62 14,20|           is as old as Herodotus (ii. 73), and is told also by
63 15,2 |           Virtues (Church History ii. 18. 8) as well as the writings
64 15,3 |         of the writings of Philo (ii. 18) and Josephus (iii.
65 15,3 |        knew a “letter of Pilate” (ii. 2) and the letters of Pliny
66 15,3 |    succession from the apostles” (ii. 23. 3), in the reign of
67 16   |        not only Gnostics but also II Clement 3:1, 20:5, and Origen
68 16   |           Origen First Principles II. 6. 1; for “soul-body-spirit”
69 16   |           of Theological Studies, II (1900-19010, 273-74).~  [
70 16   |           Callisti Church History ii. 25.~  [27] On Illustrious
71 16   |       Kunstprosa (Leipzig, 1898), II, 547; cf. Bonner's ed.,
72 16   |          Extraits des Livres I et II du Contre Celse d’Origene,
73 16   |          Eusebious Church History ii, 25. 7.~  [82] A work Against
74 16   |         day was a thousand years. II Peter says both (3:8). The