Chapter, Paragraph

 1  1,2 |   Papias (ca. A.D. 120) says of Matthew compiling the logia in “
 2  1,2 |        mean “sayings,” and what Matthew compiled probably consisted
 3  2,4 | apocalypse, apparently based on Matthew 24. Naturally the question
 4  2,4 |      expressed in the Gospel of Matthew, and it appears that, at
 5  2,6 |       to show acquaintance with Matthew, and he knows the Pauline
 6  2,8 |        Romans and the Gospel of Matthew had grappled with these
 7  2,8 |         indicated by his use of Matthew, of Old Testament “testimonies,”
 8  2,9 |     James, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Nathanael, Judas the Zealot,
 9  4,2 |     individual gospels of Mark, Matthew, and John, however, as the
10  4,2 |       enlarged by the author of Matthew, and also imitated by Luke
11  4,4 |   Aramaic form of the Gospel of Matthew, and Jerome does not entirely
12  4,4 |         much from the Gospel of Matthew that they naturally had
13  4,4 |         doubt that it drew from Matthew, not Matthew from it. The
14  4,4 |       it drew from Matthew, not Matthew from it. The influence of
15  4,4 |        manifest indebtedness to Matthew and Luke is observed, it
16  4,4 |       length of the Gospel ofr~ Matthew, containing 2,200 stichoi,
17  4,4 |         length against 2,500 in Matthew. It told of the baptism,
18  4,4 |     This carries the account in Matthew a long step further. In
19  4,4 |         a long step further. In Matthew, John sug ; Bests his freedom
20  4,4 |        used a gospel resembling Matthew, which they call “According
21  4,5 |        but by a former wife (On Matthew I3:55). Eusebius, early
22  4,9 |     person, singular or plural, Matthew being the spokesman in the
23  4,9 |         of names: “According to Matthew,” “the Gospel of the Hebrews,” “
24  4,9 |        It owed most to Luke and Matthew; the Paulinism of John would
25  4,9 |      representing the voices of Matthew and the Twelve was evidently
26  4,9 |    Judas Iscariot.[18] And you, Matthew, I called as you sat at
27  4,10|         James (On the Gospel of Matthew 13: 55). Clement of Alexandria,
28  4,10|         and Philip, Thomas, and Matthew are named as the three witnesses
29  4,14|   Gospel of Apelles (Preface to Matthew). No traces of such works
30  5,4 |       the size of the Gospel of Matthew. The Greek Acts of John
31  5,5 |         and Paul. The Gospel of Matthew contained a strong commendation
32  5,8 |      Andrew and of Matthias (or Matthew) among the cannibals, who
33  6,3 |         Papias' statement about Matthew: “So then Matthew composed
34  6,3 |         about Matthew: “So then Matthew composed the Sayings (logic)
35  6,3 |         meaning of this is that Matthew the apostle was believed
36  6,3 |     hanged himself and died, as Matthew reported (Matt. 27:5), but
37  7,1 |  Eusebius to date the Gospel of Matthew in A.D. 41, when Matthew
38  7,1 |        Matthew in A.D. 41, when Matthew would, according to this
39  8,4 |      far back as the writing of Matthew, which was written in part
40 12,1 |        length, about as long as Matthew or Acts. Rufinus laughed
41 12,3 |        Jeremiah, twenty-five on Matthew, thirty-nine on Luke, twenty-seven
42 12,3 |        Prophets, twenty-five on Matthew, thirty-two on John, fifteen
43 12,3 |     than half the commentary on Matthew, and Rufinus' recast of
44 13,9 |  reconcile their differences in Matthew and Luke, was used by Origen
45 14,21| Ecclsiastes, the Song of Songs, Matthew, and the Revelation, but
46 16   |        On Zechariah; no text~On Matthew (part); no text~The Parable
47 16   |    Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Matthew; no text~ ~There were, of
48 16   |         language and thought of Matthew 24.~  [7] The Books of Clement,
49 16   |       aa: i, which is quoted in Matthew (27:46) and Mark (15:34)