Chapter, Paragraph

 1 Pref |          purposely repeated with each mention of the names of ancient
 2  1,2 |         tradition.~But have we actual mention of such a work — if anything
 3  2,7 |           Paul “in every letter makes mention of [mnemoneuei] you” may
 4  2,14|          survive. We should, however, mention what is probably the earliest
 5  3   |             in the Roman church.~ The mention of Clement as still being
 6  3   |             first Christian writer to mention the Sibyl, and Justin, Athenagoras,
 7  4,5 |             first Christian writer to mention it by name. He had heard
 8  4,5 |               of Alexandria, makes no mention of the Gospel of Peter,
 9  4,8 |              a gospel except Origen's mention of it, although it is also
10  4,9 |             is the earliest writer to mention the Gospel ofthe Twelve,
11  4,10|               circles we should first mention the Gospel of Judas, which
12  4,10|              have already discussed.~ Mention of Nag Hammadi leads us
13  5,8 |             is the earliest writer to mention them, and we cannot be sure
14  6,1 |               Gnostic remains; we may mention the one called “Harvest”
15  6,2 |       Eusebius is the first writer to mention 11 Clement (Church History
16  6,2 |              matter; I Clement has no mention of Clement. It is, of course,
17  6,3 |              Christian writers use or mention Papias other than Irenaeus (
18  7,4 | Jewish-Christian dialogues. The first mention of it is in the famous True
19  7,4 |             century reports Clement's mention of the Dialogue.~ Jerome
20  8,1 |             Clement and Origen do not mention him. How far he may have
21  8,3 |          Eusebius and Epiphanius both mention Tatian and the Diatessaron,
22  9,3 |           that time. But the earliest mention of it is in Lactantius,
23  9,3 |           Eastern Christian writer to mention Theophilus, as far as our
24 11,2 |           Pamphilus, and Eusebius all mention Pantaenus and speak of him
25 13,3 |               and it is worthwhile to mention them, if for no other reason
26 13,4 |            Refutation, which makes no mention of Artemon. It was also
27 13,12|              because Eusebius made no mention of him in the Church History.
28 13,15|              enough, Eusebius did not mention Methodius in his extant
29 14,9 |            absence of scripture or of mention of Christ by name in the
30 14,9 |               be dated about 240. Its mention by Lactantius, about A.D.
31 14,13|         Cyprian's name, they call for mention here. The most famous is
32 15,3 |              apology by Quadratus and mention that by Aristides (iv. 3);
33 15,4 |       Dionysius of Alexandria, not to mention the Christian writing by “