Chapter, Paragraph

 1  2,5 |       bishop and presbyters.~The style of Ignatius owes much to
 2  2,5 |        what was called the Asian style, as opposed to the more
 3  2,6 |          than Ignatius does. His style, however, lacks the rugged
 4  2,8 |          the informal epistolary style used in family letters,
 5  3   |          writer made use of this style in the Revelation of John.
 6  3   |         commandments, diffuse in style and quite unlike the Ten
 7  4,4 |         that gospel. Its diffuse style and evidently secondary
 8  5,7 |   chapters lo and 39 recalls the style of the Isis litany discovered
 9  8,1 |          however, in vocabulary, style, and thought between this
10  8,2 |    reveal a decidedly rhetorical style, which sometimes seems to
11  8,2 |         with matters of literary style and belongs with such documents
12  8,3 |         of Paul to improve their style. Perhaps this rumor should
13  8,3 |          he was improving Paul's style. Rufinus' statement that
14  9,1 |     These overconscioushabits of style weary the modern reader,
15  9,1 | declamatory elegance of Melito's style, although Tertullian was
16 11,3 |         perfectly with Clement's style and vocabulary and almost
17 13,11|      Revelation. He compared its style and ideas with those of
18 14,6 |          sees only one side. His style is impetuous, dramatic,
19 14,8 |         to reform Roman literary style, advocating a return to
20 14,9 |       agreed that in elegance of style Minucius' defense of Christianity
21 14,9 |         to Minucius but says the style is very unlike that of the
22 14,16|    possessed of a poetical prose style, and equipped with all the
23 14,20|      Augustine. The charm of his style and the wealth of his imagination
24 14,21|           Haussleiter, finds his style decidedly awkward.~ Victorious
25 14,21|      attractive idea is that the style seems rather better than
26 14,21|          work of Victorinus; the style is like his, and Jerome