Chapter, Paragraph

 1  1,1 | regarded as providing the true interpretation of the Old Testament books.~
 2  2,8 |       teacher who offered this interpretation was very proud of it. “No
 3  6,2 |    provide one means of giving interpretation to the biblical texts. Another
 4  8,1 |    scriptures in the manner of interpretation customary with Jews, Greeks,
 5 12,1 |        heads: textual studies, interpretation, theological' studies, apologetics,
 6 12,3 |                                Interpretation~ Origen must have been a
 7 12,3 |        scriptures, his work in interpretation covered every book of the
 8 12,3 |        Even more important for interpretation, of course, were his commentaries,
 9 12,3 |        much use of allegory in interpretation; it was, of course, by the
10 13,2 |        the fields of scripture interpretation, polemic and doctrinal writing,
11 13,3 |                      Scripture Interpretation.~ Fully half of the looks
12 13,3 |       know were devoted to the interpretation of the scriptures. His interest
13 13,3 |    West. Hippolvtus' method of interpretation was, of course, highly allegorical;
14 13,3 |     and more historical in his interpretation than his Alexandrian contciiiporary
15 13,8 |        practice, doctrine, and interpretation. Little that he accomplished
16 14,12|   Prayer, presents a practical interpretation of the prayer, illustrating