Council,  Canon

  1 Intro  |            Nicea to the privileges of Rome, Alexandria and Antioch: “
  2   1”,6 |             accorded to the bishop of Rome. Likewise with reference
  3   1”,6 |         Antioch, and the Patriarch of Rome, succinctly and comprehensively. (
  4   1”,6 |            regard to the Patriarch of Rome[8] in that he was allowed
  5   1”,7 |      innovation (for the seniority of Rome was not renewed, because,
  6   1”,7 |         honors, in that the bishop of Rome came first, the bishop of
  7   1”,8 |  anathematized by the Council held in Rome in the time of Pope Cornelius,
  8   2”,3 |             honor after the Bishop of Rome, because of its being New
  9   2”,3 |              because of its being New Rome.~ ~Interpretation.~The preceding
 10   2”,3 |             the Pope and Patriarch of Rome, since Constantinople itself
 11   2”,3 |             itself is also called New Rome.~ The preposition after
 12   2”,3 |       priorities to the Bishop of old Rome and to the Bishop of new
 13   2”,3 |              and to the Bishop of new Rome; and in the fact that the
 14   2”,3 |         priorities with the Bishop of Rome. That it refers to order
 15   2”,3 |            second after the Bishop of Rome, not the second in point
 16   2”,3 |              III, calls the Bishop of Rome first, and the Bishop of
 17   2”,3 |             in order after the one of Rome. Note that inasmuch as Zonaras,
 18   2”,3 |            with respect to the one of Rome, was ascribed only with
 19   3    |            the place of the bishop of Rome Celestine I at first, was
 20   3    |             but afterwards legates of Rome were sent from the West,
 21   4    |              most holy Leo, Bishop of Rome. They condemned and consigned
 22   4    |               of the most holy Leo of Rome,[82] left unaltered the
 23   4    |            legates from the Bishop of Rome were not listened to, while
 24   4”,28| Constantinople otherwise known as New Rome; we too decree and vote
 25   4”,28|           same Constantinople and New Rome. And this is in keeping
 26   4”,28|       priorities to the throne of Old Rome on account of her being
 27   4”,28|               most holy throne of New Rome, with good reason deeming
 28   4”,28|              is equal to old imperial Rome in respect of other privileges
 29   4”,28|              honor with the Bishop of Rome, seeing that it is New Rome,
 30   4”,28|           Rome, seeing that it is New Rome, therefore the fathers of
 31   4”,28|            which is also known as New Rome. For, they say, just as
 32   4”,28|     privileges upon the throne of Old Rome on account of the fact that
 33   4”,28|               most holy throne of New Rome[112] — of Constantinople,
 34   4”,28|              manner as has also (old) Rome, ought to enjoy the same
 35   4”,28|              manner as has also (old) Rome, and to be magnified herself
 36   4”,28|              sole difference that old Rome is to be first in order,
 37   4”,28|             first in order, while new Rome is to be second in order.
 38   4”,30|               of St. Leo, the Pope of Rome, which he had sent to the
 39   5    |               Vigilius, the Bishop of Rome, who, though at the time
 40   6    |               as exarchs of Agatho of Rome, Peter the monk who represented
 41   6    |             assembled at that time in Rome. This Council condemned
 42   6    |  Constantinople; Honorius the Pope of Rome,[120] Cyrus the Patriarch
 43   6    |                according to Leo II of Rome in what he wrote to the
 44   7    |             the legate of the Pope of Rome,[126] Peter the Patriarch
 45   7    |            the legates of the Pope of Rome, as well as those of the
 46   7”,1 |                Honorius (the Pope) of Rome, Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul,
 47   7”,3 |        legates and representatives of Rome had proposed that the strict
 48   7”,13|               we have learned that in Rome it is kept as inviolable
 49   7”,29|           does not permit to occur in Rome, on account of the docility
 50   7”,29|           custom originally came from Rome to Barbary, according to
 51   7”,35|              with the throne of older Rome, and in ecclesiastical matters
 52   7”,35|            privileges with the one of Rome, and shall be magnified
 53   7”,54|            must be kept rigorously in Rome too, iterating it verbatim —
 54   7”,69|               to bishops Dionysius of Rome and Maximus of Alexandria
 55   7”,80|             Council which was held in Rome A.D. 487 under Pope Felix
 56   8    |            Peter the Archpresbyter of Rome, and Peter, he too another
 57   8    |            monastery of St. Sabbas in Rome, all of them acting as representatives
 58   8”,23|            first called the Biship of Rome a Patriarch, and also applied
 59   8”,23|               number, namely, that of Rome, that of Constantinople,
 60   8”,23|          Alexandria, the letter r for Rome, the second letter a for
 61   8”,23|           i.e., the so-called Pope of Rome) bolted the reins, the Patriarch
 62   8”,23|           asserted that the Bishop of Rome possessed sovereign authority
 63   8”,23|         allowed also to the Bishop in Rome. At this point note that
 64   8”,23|             accorded to the Bishop of Rome,” it says. What treatment
 65   8”,23|             For just as the Bishop of Rome possesses this customary
 66   8”,23|            matter, and the diocese of Rome is limited like that of
 67   8”,23|            fact that the seniority of Rome had remained intact, the
 68   8”,23|              the matter as concerning Rome too. (Dositheus, in the
 69   8”,23|          privileges of the Bishops of Rome, of Alexandria, and of Antioch
 70   8”,23|          bishops of Alexandria and of Rome patriarchs here (Dositheus,
 71   8”,23|            stood in the Capitolium of Rome.~ ~  [11] It was named Caesarea
 72   8”,23|              statues of Caesar and of Rome. But there were three cities
 73   8”,23|              and Liberius, bishops of Rome, Sozomen states that after
 74   8”,23|              Cornelius, the bishop of Rome, in writing to Phanius the
 75   8”,23|           making himself, a bishop of Rome, when as a matter of fact
 76   8”,23|               of the present Popes of Rome, the claim, that is to say,
 77   8”,23|        Dorylaeum, after going away to Rome, and in the presence of
 78   8”,23|              to the most holy Pope of Rome Leo, who accepted it.~ ~  [
 79   8”,23|            writing to the Emperors of Rome said: “One thing and a fine
 80   8”,23|           Constantinople John, and of Rome Virgilius in writing to
 81   8”,23|              John himself the Pope of Rome, who was also present by
 82   8”,23|              545. And Pope Leo III of Rome, in the beginning of the
 83   8”,23|             Eulogius that the Pope of Rome Leo has come in order to
 84   8”,23|              fact that the legates of Rome made strenuous efforts to
 85   8”,23|            all, because the Bishop of Rome is chief even of the Bishop
 86   8”,23|               the Bishop, or Pope, of Rome is the ultimate and common
 87   8”,23|              as meaning the Bishop of Rome by the phrase “Exarch of
 88   8”,23|              is to say, the Bishop of Rome, though by concession and
 89   8”,23|        himsell and also the Bishop of Rome as well, and thus the Bishop
 90   8”,23|               office of the Bishop of Rome, they are wrecking and demolishing
 91   8”,23|            greater than the Bishop of Rome? So the Lord liveth, He
 92   8”,23|            precisely as the Bishop of Rome must hear the appeals only
 93   8”,23|              subject to the Bishop of Rome.” Now, however, that the
 94   8”,23|              subject to the Bishop of Rome, and others subject to the
 95   8”,23|              legates of the Bishop of Rome were displeased by the priorities
 96   8”,23|            Great, who was the Pope of Rome, and his legates resented,
 97   8”,23|           bestowed upon the Bishop of Rome, namely, the Patriarchal
 98   8”,23|           bestowed upon the Bishop of Rome, namely, the right of ordination
 99   8”,23|            precisely as the Bishop of Rome has the priorities of honor
100   8”,23|              just as is the Bishop of Rome, without any difference
101   8”,23|              this, that the Bishop of Rome is first in point of order,
102   8”,23|               primacy and priority of Rome, and its right to be magnified
103   8”,23|          grandeur as is the Bishop of Rome. But, as a matter of fact,
104   8”,23|          inferred, upon the Bishop of Rome. But neither are the priorities
105   8”,23|         neither are the priorities of Rome those which were conferred
106   8”,23|           upon Silvester, the Pope of Rome, as they allege — which
107   8”,23|          conferred upon the Bishop of Rome by the Canons. By no means.
108   8”,23|               priority and primacy of Rome’s Bishop, therefore, consists,
109   8”,23|               the see, or diocese, of Rome, so that he, together with
110   8”,23|               privileges, not because Rome was the seat of St. Peter,
111   8”,23|             not because the Bishop of Rome is the vicar of Christ,
112   8”,23|          means, but primarily because Rome was honored as the capital
113   8”,23|       priorities to the throne of Old Rome on account of her being
114   8”,23|               it followed, exactly as Rome was a capital city, it becomes
115   8”,23|             imperial capital, and New Rome, the Canons conferred such
116   8”,23|          privilege upon the Bishop of Rome for the same identical reason.
117   8”,23|         privileges with the Bishop of Rome which the Bishop of Constantinople
118   8”,23|                although the Bishop of Rome was given by many the appellation
119   8”,23|            reference to tne Bishop of Rome, though very seldom; whereas
120   8”,23|             or Nicholas), the Pope of Rome.” The title of Ecumenical,”
121   8”,23|       Patriarch, nor is the Bishop of Rome, or anyone else, excepting
122   8”,23|      Constantinople, and the Popes of Rome named Pelagius, and Gregory
123   8”,23|           Council held against him in Rome during the time of Felix
124   8”,23|           during the time of Felix of Rome, and of Acacius of Constantinople,
125   8”,23|           great pontifex, the Pope of Rome named Honorius. Being unable
126   8”,23|            asserts that the throne of Rome cannot be judged (adversely)
127   8”,23|              how could the legates of Rome who were present at the
128   8”,23|       addition, Adrian I, the Pope of Rome, in his letter to Tarasius,
129   8”,23|             it specifically refers to Rome, and to Africa, and to Armenia,
130   8”,23|                and so did the Pope of Rome through his legates (or
131   8”,23|        representatives of the Pope of Rome attending it (concerning
132   8”,23|        distance, says Blastaris, from Rome to Constantinople.~ ~  [
133   8”,23|               seeing that the Pope of Rome has decreed many things
134   8”,23|          legislating to the Church in Rome regarding marriages of priests;
135   8”,23|           custom, or rather canon, in Rome compelled many priests to
136   8”,23|            was caused by the canon in Rome requiring priests to agree
137   8”,23|            matter of indifference, in Rome, down to his time, there
138   8”,23|              primacy to the Bishop of Rome (though Heraclius annulled
139   8”,23|            were rich brothers who fed Rome in time of war and hunger —
140   8”,23|            let the two-horned Pope of Rome learn how antichristian
141   8”,23|              even the Council held in Rome in the time of Martin against