Council,  Canon

 1   1”,19|               XLVII; c. II of the 1st Ec. C.; c. XCV of the 6th;
 2   2”,3 |              to c. XXXVI of the Sixth Ec. C., there would result
 3   2”,3 |           XXVIII (i.e., of the Fourth Ec. C). merely confirmed this.[
 4   2”,7 |           believes (just as the First Ec. C. demanded this stipulation
 5   2”,7 |                Canon XIX of the First Ec. C. wants all Paulianists
 6   4    |             common Creed of the First Ec. Council, held in Nicaea,
 7   4”,1 |            and Canon I of the Seventh Ec. C., dealing with the same
 8   4”,9 |              to c. CXVIII of the same Ec. C. of Carthage. Canon LXXXVII
 9   4”,12|              the First; Ap. c. XXXIV; ec. VI, VII of the First; cc.
10   4”,12|               with c. VI of the First Ec. C., which says that one
11   4”,15| Interpretation of c. XIX of the First Ec. C. and the third Footnote
12   4”,17|           desuetude after this Fourth Ec. C. was held, as we said
13   4”,17|               two sections, the Sixth Ec. C. incorporated in its
14   4”,17|          LXXIV, of c. VI of the First Ec. C., and c. IX of the present
15   4”,17|              IX of the present Fourth Ec. C.~ ~ ~
16   4”,21|            LXXIV and c. VI of the 2nd Ec. C.~ ~ ~
17   4”,24|             ones mentioned by the 7th Ec. C. in its c. XIII, wherein
18   5    |         respective Act of the Seventh Ec. C. See also p. 14 in the
19   7    |           were present at the Seventh Ec. C., by the so-called First-and-Second
20   7    |               in Act 4 of the Seventh Ec. C.) says in reference to
21   7    |          Canons (Act 4 of the Seventh Ec. C., p. 780 of the second
22   7    |             read aloud to the Seventh Ec. C. Peter the Bishop of
23   7”,5 |         refers to c. III of the First Ec. C. — such persons being
24   7”,5 |              also c. III of the First Ec. C.~ ~ ~
25   7”,7 |            also c. XVIII of the First Ec. C.~ ~
26   7”,21|             4th; c. XXIII of the 6th; ec. IV, V, XIX of the 7th;
27   8    |             universal Church. The 7th Ec. C. is recognized by the
28   8”,23|             4th, but after the Fourth Ec. C. such a synod ceased
29   8”,23|           metropolitans in the Fourth Ec. C. — an authority which
30   8”,23|              Prolegomena of the First Ec. C.).~ ~  [60] In the letter
31   8”,23|          short while before the First Ec. C. But it may also be said
32   8”,23|               1 to c. II of the First Ec. C.~ ~  [68] Inevitably,
33   8”,23|       Footnote to c. XCV of the Sixth Ec. C., in order to realize
34   8”,23|             Prolegomena of the Fourth Ec. C. But note that the Lord’
35   8”,23|             who presided at the First Ec. C.). Again, Basil, in his
36   8”,23|              at the time of the Sixth Ec. C. in writing to the Emperors
37   8”,23|               definition of the Third Ec. C. which placed under anathema
38   8”,23|               definition of the Third Ec. C. ought, in emulation
39   8”,23|               that just as the Second Ec. C. did not sin by adding
40   8”,23|             imaginery. For the Second Ec. C., possessing the same
41   8”,23|             Sardica before the Second Ec. C. forbade anyone to propound
42   8”,23|            additions which the Second Ec. C. made to the work of
43   8”,23|             in the Creed of the First Ec. C.; for the Third Council
44   8”,23|               additions of the Second Ec. C. are properly speaking
45   8”,23|            present Canon of the Third Ec. C., and the words of the
46   8”,23|         account c. XXXIX of the Sixth Ec. C. calls Cyprus New Justinianopolis.
47   8”,23|              is amazing that this 3rd Ec. C. did not reprimand the
48   8”,23|        Footnote to c. IX of the First Ec. C. See also the form for
49   8”,23|             in the case of the Fourth Ec. C.~ ~  [82] This holy St.
50   8”,23|               Orthodoxy in the Fourth Ec. C., so and in like manner
51   8”,23|            like manner at the Seventh Ec. C. the letters sent to
52   8”,23|              the Preface to the Third Ec. C. But the Fourth Council
53   8”,23|              Prolegomena of the First Ec. C.~ ~  [83] By way of giving
54   8”,23|             especially by the Seventh Ec. C. in its Act 6.~ ~  [84]
55   8”,23|               anathematize the Fourth Ec. C., or because they used
56   8”,23|               to Act 6 of the Seventh Ec. C., because they maintained
57   8”,23|             4th, and c. XI of the 7th Ec. C. Defensors were appointed
58   8”,23|                as c. VI of the Second Ec. C. says, if anyone dishonors
59   8”,23|            not long after this Fourth Ec. Council was held. That
60   8”,23|          Footnote to c. VI of the 2nd Ec. C., which spoke about the
61   8”,23|               be cudgeled.~ The Sixth Ec. C. makes this same Canon
62   8”,23|   Constantinople. 2) Since the Second Ec. C. also in its c. Ill accorded
63   8”,23|             from Act 13 of the Fourth Ec. C., many scandals arose
64   8”,23|        according to c. XVI of the 7th Ec. C. and c. XXVII of the
65   8”,23|               of Antioch at the Sixth Ec. C. in the seventh century
66   8”,23|          XXXIV and c. VI of the First Ec. C.~ ~  [115] Note that
67   8”,23|              not long after the Sixth Ec. C. admitted and accepted
68   8”,23|          recorded in Act 2 of the 7th Ec. C. (page 748 of the Collection
69   8”,23|                III of this same Sixth Ec. C. obviously bears witness
70   8”,23|               This canon of the Sixth Ec. C. is mentioned also the
71   8”,23|        mentioned also the the Seventh Ec. C. in its sixth act and
72   8”,23|         explains also why the Seventh Ec. C. (Letter to Alexandria,
73   8”,23|              Canon XCVII of the Sixth Ec. C. commands that nobody
74   8”,23|            here this Canon of the 2nd Ec. C., which was issued against
75   8”,23|        according to Act 6 of this 7th Ec. C. As for those who only
76   8”,23|            Nilus, in Act 4 of the 7th Ec. C.3) the fact that they
77   8”,23|              of Gordius, and this 7th Ec. C.; 6) because they incite