Council,  Canon

 1 Intro  |        decisions of the patriarchal synod in Constantinople are very
 2 Intro  |         canon. Thus, canon 8 of the Synod in Trullo begins by recalling
 3 Intro  |       invasions, the Fathers of the Synod in Trullo decided in favor
 4   1”,5 |          permission is given to the synod to release them from it
 5   1”,5 |      offered to God. Let the second synod be held in the time of autumn.
 6   2”,2 |              it is evident that the synod of each province will confine
 7   2”,2 |      invited to do so; and that the synod of each particular province
 8   2”,2 |            patriarchs, the diocesan synod shall govern such matters
 9   2”,2 |         says to the effect that the synod of each province (of the
10   2”,2 |         enough bishops to make up a synod, or it was necessary for
11   2”,2 |         what is missing for a local synod. Which, though contrary
12   2”,6 |         they are to go to a greater synod of the Bishops of this diocese
13   2”,6 |           accused bishop before the synod of all the bishops of that
14   2”,6 |     particular province. But if the synod of the province cannot dispose
15   2”,6 |            matter up to the greater synod of the bishops of the Diocese,[
16   2”,6 |            if a bishop deposed by a synod or council, does not resort
17   2”,6 |             not resort to a greater synod or council of bishops, but,
18   2”,7 |          with c. XXXIX of the local synod or regional council held
19   3”,8 |             addressed to the sacred Synod in Pamphylia in favor of
20   3”,8 |      written resignation. Hence the Synod there ordained another bishop
21   4    |          the Latrocinium (or Robber Synod) which had previously been
22   4    |          the Latrocinium (or Robber Synod). The second volume comprises
23   4”,1 |       regional Council or any local Synod, should continue in full
24   4”,9 |              let it be tried by the Synod of the province. But if
25   4”,9 |            case be tried before the Synod of the province. When, again,
26   4”,17|        permitted to complain to the Synod of the province. But if
27   4”,17|           dispute considered by the Synod of the province. If, again,
28   4”,17|          the words “complain to the Synod of the province,” while
29   4”,17|           request of the Council or Synod, but by despotism and assault,
30   4”,28|          must take the votes of the Synod under him into consideration
31   7”,8 |            it has seemed best for a synod or council of the aforementioned
32   7”,8 |  circumstances, they command that a synod of Bishops be held in any
33   7”,8 |          matters that come up. This synod, or council, has to be held,
34   7”,8 |    themselves at the meeting of the synod, they are to be reprimanded
35   7”,24|         bring the matter before the Synod of the province.~(c. XVII
36   7”,69|             of the Sixth Ecumenical Synod decrees the following with
37   7”,89|    God-bearing Fathers of the First Synod, i.e., St. Peter and St.
38   8”,23|     interpreted as meaning that the synod (or council) must vote for
39   8”,23|            and dioceses by a common synod, as this was done also by
40   8”,23|          was compelled by the first synod held in Lycos to continue
41   8”,23|            called to account by the Synod for the excessively lenient
42   8”,23|           was told, however, by the Synod that though permission was
43   8”,23| inconsiderate concession. Hence the Synod inflicted the penances of
44   8”,23|        Father or decrees of a local synod or regional council (that
45   8”,23|             outside the Council and Synod the Chartophylax of the
46   8”,23|          held in Ephesus, “the holy Synod of the Eastern diocese.”
47   8”,23|             stated, the phrase “The Synod of the Diocese” is never
48   8”,23|            the Fourth Ec. C. such a synod ceased to be operative.
49   8”,23|          alone or together with his synod tries the case of a bishop
50   8”,23|          same as saying that if the synod of a province tries a case,
51   8”,23|             the Canon here calls a “synod of the diocese” is called
52   8”,23|        because he mentions only the Synod of the province the Synod
53   8”,23|           Synod of the province the Synod of the diocese, and the
54   8”,23|         diocese, and the ecumenical Synod (i.e., Council). But in
55   8”,23|      clearer we must state that the Synod of a Diocese was the assembly,
56   8”,23|          however, that this sort of Synod has fallen into desuetude,
57   8”,23|          fallen into desuetude, the Synod of each particular Patriarch
58   8”,23|        jurisdiction, as though this Synod had become a greater one
59   8”,23|       become a greater one than the synod of the diocese, since the
60   8”,23|             has been decided by the synod of the diocese, this Council
61   8”,23|          him on behalf of the whole synod. If even this arrangement
62   8”,23|             of the hand. This local synod, or regional council, was
63   8”,23|             is why in Act 10 of the Synod held in the time of Basil
64   8”,23|           Canon does say; whereas a Synod of the Diocese and an Exarch
65   8”,23|              Now, however, that the Synod and the Exarch of the diocese
66   8”,23|          the Latrocinium, or Robber Synod, held in Ephesus, placed
67   8”,23|       before the Fifth Council by a Synod or Council held against
68   8”,23|            by the local Council, or Synod, held in Toledo, and others.
69   8”,23|             is decreed by the local Synod held in the city of Antisiodorus,
70   8”,23|       anyone else, according to the Synod, or local Council, held
71   8”,23|             them, just as the above Synod held during the patriarchate
72   8”,23|           to be decided upon by the Synod as reasonable. John of Kitros