Council,  Canon

 1 Intro  |           quote the statement of Metropolitan Zachary of Chalcedon at
 2 Intro  |         can mention the works of Metropolitan Andrew Saguna, N. Popovici,
 3   1”,4 |          in each province to the Metropolitan.~(Ap. c. I; c. III of the
 4   1”,4 |         left and referred to the metropolitan of each province as the
 5   1”,6 |        made a bishop without the Metropolitan’s approval, the great Council
 6   1”,6 |          the approval of his own metropolitan, as this great Council has
 7   1”,6 |   election had to be made by the Metropolitan, and whoever was approved
 8   1”,6 |      whoever was approved by the Metropolitan had to be made a bishop (
 9   1”,7 |      sequence of honor, with the Metropolitan having his own dignity preserved.~(
10   1”,7 |     ought to be preserved to the Metropolitan of Palestine whose seat
11   1”,18|         of his own Patriarch, or Metropolitan, he is then to be honored
12   2”,2 |       without the consent of the metropolitan, and in which the present
13   2”,2 |         of each province (of the metropolitan, that is to say) shall govern
14   3”,1 |    holiness and love that if any Metropolitan of the province has apostatized
15   3”,1 |       your loving group that any metropolitan that has separated from
16   3”,1 |         because he (sc. any such metropolitan) has been deprived of every
17   3”,8 |          prevailed of yore; each Metropolitan having permission to take
18   3”,8 |   entitled to. Accordingly, each Metropolitan shall have permission to
19   4”,9 | Clergyman has a dispute with the Metropolitan of the same province, let
20   4”,9 | clergyman has a dispute with the Metropolitan, let him go to the Exarch
21   4”,9 |     accused one is a bishop, his Metropolitan shall examine into the facts
22   4”,9 |         accused one himself is a Metropolitan, the Archbishop to whom
23   4”,12|         without allowing the new Metropolitan, who bears this title only
24   4”,12|          its being the one whose Metropolitan ordains the Bishop of the
25   4”,12|      consent and approval of the Metropolitan is not a bishop. Read also
26   4”,17|      unjustly treated by his own Metropolitan, let him complain to the
27   4”,17|         in regard thereto by his Metropolitan, let him refer his case
28   4”,19|       each province wherever the Metropolitan may deem fit, and adjust
29   4”,25|        no one can go there). Any Metropolitan that is remiss in this respect,
30   4”,28|        that is to say, that each Metropolitan of the aforesaid dioceses,
31   4”,28|     these is ordained by his own Metropolitan together with the bishops
32   7”,7 |          of his own Patriarch or Metropolitan and has come to another
33   7”,7 | representative of a Patriarch or Metropolitan, sent to another region,
34   7”,7 |          place of a Patriarch or Metropolitan, as we have said. Any deacon
35   7”,8 |          the place, wherever the Metropolitan of each province (or eparchy)
36   7”,34|         the same church. For the Metropolitan shall safely keep all such
37   7”,34|  Carthage.)~ ~Interpretation.~No Metropolitan, says the present Canon,
38   7”,34|         that bishopric, then the Metropolitan shall take charge of them
39   7”,38|      ancient custom. So that the Metropolitan of the city of Cyzicus shall
40   8”,2 |     scrupulously examined by the metropolitan as to whether he is cheerfully
41   8”,2 |          must be examined by the metropolitan scrupulously as to whether
42   8”,3 |          in each province to the Metropolitan.”~(Ap. cc. I, II, XXX, LXI;
43   8”,4 |         if he is a bishop by his Metropolitan, or if he is a Metropolitan
44   8”,4 |      Metropolitan, or if he is a Metropolitan by his Patriarch. For the
45   8”,6 |         eyes” (Ps. 19:8). But no Metropolitan shall have any right to
46   8”,6 |     excommunicated; and that any Metropolitan that is remiss in regard
47   8”,6 |         Book of Proverbs. But no Metropolitan has any permission to demand
48   8”,11|      church. Accordingly if each Metropolitan appoints a Steward in his
49   8”,11|       that one, adds that if any Metropolitan appoints a steward of his
50   8”,11|       for their bishoprics their Metropolitan is to be allowed to appoint
51   8”,11|         one in this event by the Metropolitan, or if even the Metropolitan
52   8”,11|     Metropolitan, or if even the Metropolitan neglects to take care of
53   8”,23|     province must be left to the Metropolitan, and the latter must ordain
54   8”,23|        are to be referred to the Metropolitan or to the Patriarch; one
55   8”,23|          here are not those of a metropolitan, as certain writers have
56   8”,23|       bishop is appointed by the metropolitan. Accordingly, the chorepiscopus
57   8”,23|         ch. 44). Elias, too, the Metropolitan of Crete, in writing to
58   8”,23|      Carth. B) the province of a Metropolitan, according to c. XXVIII
59   8”,23|          he says: “For whether a metropolitan alone or together with his
60   8”,23|     bring his case up before the metropolitan. If the latter too is open
61   8”,23|        having a dispute with the Metropolitan ought to have it tried first
62   8”,23|         one. even though he be a Metropolitan or a Patriarch, has any
63   8”,23|          to Balsamon, is not the Metropolitan of the province (since a
64   8”,23|         and metropolis), but the Metropolitan of the Diocese; nor the
65   8”,23|       Exarch of a diocese is the Metropolitan of the diocese who has some
66   8”,23|   dispute or difference with the Metropolitan of an exarchy, let him apply
67   8”,23|   dispute or difference with the Metropolitan of some other diocese, or
68   8”,23|      some other diocese, or if a Metropolitan has a dispute or difference
69   8”,23|   dispute or difference with the Metropolitan of any diocese or parish
70   8”,23|        Bishop Elias to Peter the Metropolitan of Damascus.)~ ~  [122]
71   8”,23|        the latter asked the then Metropolitan of Corinth whether one who
72   8”,23|        to Theophanes, became the Metropolitan of Thessalonica and the