Council,  Canon

 1   3    |      Council was convoked against Nestorius, who hailed from the town
 2   3    |         Council anathematized[71] Nestorius on account of these views,
 3   3    |         Mother.” In the letter to Nestorius, on the other hand, which
 4   3    |            Church, Proclus, while Nestorius the heresiarch was sitting
 5   3”,1 |           of apostasy, the one of Nestorius, that is to say, and of
 6   3”,2 |  subscribing to the deposition of Nestorius have receded to the convocation
 7   3”,2 |  confirming the document deposing Nestorius from office they have turned
 8   3”,3 |           shorn of holy orders by Nestorius and his party on account
 9   3”,3 |     Because of the fact that when Nestorius was Patriarch of Constantinople
10   3”,4 |            to hold the beliefs of Nestorius or of Celestius, the holy
11   3”,4 |        the dogma, or doctrine, of Nestorius and of Celestius, who shared
12   3”,5 |        improper acts, and to whom Nestorius and those sharing his views
13   3”,5 |         the indifference shown by Nestorius in all matters, we have
14   3”,5 |       their own bishops, and whom Nestorius and his sympathizers either
15   3”,7 |     unholy and perverse dogmas of Nestorius, which have even been subjoined,
16   3”,7 |        the Creed of Jewish-minded Nestorius, in which his unholy dogmas
17   3”,7 |           and heretical dogmas of Nestorius concerning the incarnation
18   4    |           the opposite of that of Nestorius, shared also the latter’
19   4    |           perdition like him. For Nestorius had divided the one Christ
20   4    |      Theodoret said: “Anathema to Nestorius, and to whoever refuses
21   5    |        who, holding the tenets of Nestorius, left these records in writing
22   5    |          served as the teacher of Nestorius and declared the Logos to
23   7”,1 |           driveling dissension of Nestorius on the ground that it has
24   7”,1 |       with him also Dioscorus and Nestorius, the former being a defender
25   7”,1 |        Mopsuestia, the teacher of Nestorius, and in addition Origen
26   7”,94|       heresy, the Nestorians, and Nestorius, and Eutyches and Dioscorus,
27   8”,23|     Council.~ ~  [70] I said that Nestorius became wrong-minded and
28   8”,23|           dogmas or doctrines, of Nestorius concerning the incarnation
29   8”,23|         speaking of the dogmas of Nestorius concerning the incarnation
30   8”,23|           the emperors concerning Nestorius, in which it wrote as follows: “
31   8”,23|      impious dogmas which he (sc. Nestorius) has set forth in writing
32   8”,23|           his conciliar letter to Nestorius, by saying: “It is something
33   8”,23|     essence.” So that inasmuch as Nestorius and Theodoret believed aright
34   8”,23|       Christians is the fact that Nestorius wrote in his Creed that
35   8”,23|          assert that the Creed of Nestorius was condemned in the Third
36   8”,23|                71] After recusant Nestorius was anathematized by the
37   8”,23|           of some of his friends, Nestorius was enabled to receive letters
38   8”,23|           knocked on the door. As Nestorius failed to answer, they took
39   8”,23|          that after the heresy of Nestorius became neglected, it was
40   8”,23|         Alexandria, in writing to Nestorius, says that even Athanasius
41   8”,23|       recusant and man-worshiping Nestorius called her. For in this
42   8”,23|      against the unholy dogmas of Nestorius, and the objection of the
43   8”,23|     teacher Pelagius, agreed with Nestorius in his heresy, according
44   8”,23| Theodosius. For, on the one hand, Nestorius asserted that “Since Christ
45   8”,23|      heretic and like-minded with Nestorius, as we have said.~ ~  [76]
46   8”,23|             One of them, recusant Nestorius, took the opportune occasion
47   8”,23|    Council made Cyril’s letter to Nestorius a definition of its own;
48   8”,23|           relative union (such as Nestorius used to allege); but, on
49   8”,23|          defended the cacodoxy of Nestorius and through misunderstanding
50   8”,23|         tenet was not one held by Nestorius, but was and is a dogma
51   8”,23|     Celestinus in writing against Nestorius, or John of Antioch, or
52   8”,23|         in his recommendations to Nestorius, nor any of the emperors
53   8”,23|           in their Sacrae against Nestorius, say that Nestorius blasphemed
54   8”,23|       against Nestorius, say that Nestorius blasphemed as regarding
55   8”,23|       Ephesus of having condemned Nestorius without a trial, that it
56   8”,23|          oppose the dissension of Nestorius, drifted into a new heresy
57   8”,23|     anathematize their heresy and Nestorius and the other things.” If