Council,  Canon

 1 Intro  |          introduced by hieromonk Theodoret without the knowledge of
 2 Intro  |         far-fetched additions of Theodoret. We can explain this success
 3   1    |     Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Rufinus may be considered
 4   2”,2 |         of persecutions, and, as Theodoret says, blessed Eusebius of
 5   3    |         Antiocheia, according to Theodoret, and by divine concession
 6   3”,1 |    office of John of Antioch, of Theodoret the bishop of Cyrus, of
 7   4    |          Council (Act 8) blessed Theodoret said: “Anathema to Nestorius,
 8   5    |         been written by blissful Theodoret against the twelve “heads” (
 9   7”,1 |         what had been written by Theodoret against the right faith
10   8    | Apollinarius of Alexandria,[259] Theodoret of Antioch, and Elias of
11   8”,23|      Canons.~ ~  [5] That is why Theodoret, in his Ecclesiastical History (
12   8”,23|   Jerusalem Aelian, according to Theodoret and Eusebius, after it had
13   8”,23|  incarnate economy; according to Theodoret (Conversation II), Artemon,
14   8”,23|      wrote his biography. But as Theodoret (Discourse 5, ch. 8) and
15   8”,23|       Tome are mentioned also by Theodoret (book 5, ch. 9). For in
16   8”,23|     myron, because, according to Theodoret, the Novatians did not anoint
17   8”,23|    between St. Cyril and blessed Theodoret, and which, though not a
18   8”,23|  something belonging to the Son, Theodoret said in refuting him: “True
19   8”,23|         conciliar records). When Theodoret put the matter thus, divine
20   8”,23|       which he wrote in reply to Theodoret’s refutation: “Though the
21   8”,23|     Antioch with Paul of Ephesus Theodoret wrote to John of Antioch
22   8”,23|        inasmuch as Nestorius and Theodoret believed aright in regard
23   8”,23|        they were reconciled with Theodoret or later after they had
24   8”,23|         same anathematization by Theodoret, and the apology again of
25   8”,23|    refutation of the argument of Theodoret, and in the three parts
26   8”,23|         what had been written by Theodoret against St. Cyril was not
27   8”,23|        St. Cyril, the idea that “Theodoret calls the union of the God
28   8”,23|        or through the Son, which Theodoret therein asserts, since this
29   8”,23|     serve as a temple. Moreover, Theodoret the Bishop of Cyprus, when
30   8”,23|         disciple of St. Justin. (Theodoret, Cacomythy of Heretics,
31   8”,23|    writer states, and especially Theodoret (page 193 of the second
32   8”,23|        Auspication, according to Theodoret, is a process wherein one
33   8”,23|         according to Photius and Theodoret.~ ~  [202] Let Christians
34   8”,23|        Ecclesiastical History of Theodoret (Book V, ch. 17), notwithstanding
35   8”,23|   according to custom. For, says Theodoret, after offering the gifts
36   8”,23|      them, because, according to Theodoret, Saul harried them into
37   8”,23|         St. Justin, according to Theodoret. They celebrated the Mysteries
38   8”,23|          according to Origen and Theodoret — just as were the idols