Council,  Canon

 1   3    |          apart from the conjoined Logos, and a God only by stretching
 2   3    |        respectively) betokens the Logos derived from God; since
 3   3    |        not that the nature of the Logos was transformed into flesh,
 4   3    |         it is to be said that the Logos united to Himself, with
 5   3    |       origin of the nature of the Logos, or, more specifically speaking,
 6   3    |         respect to substance, the Logos is said to have been begotten
 7   4    |         Son and only-begotten God Logos, Lord Jesus Christ, precisely
 8   5    |        Nestorius and declared the Logos to be a different God than
 9   6    |         hypostasis of the God-man Logos each form acted in communion
10   6    |          in other words, that the Logos wrought that which was the
11   6    |           was the function of the Logos, whereas the body performed
12   7”,78|       rate, who gave birth to the Logos in the flesh who is incapable
13   7”,78|           in the flesh to the God Logos, who cannot be bounded spatially;
14   7”,81|        the humiliation of the God Logos, and in memory of His life
15   8”,23|          person together with His Logos, in the same manner as a
16   8”,23|         being is one with his own logos (i.e., reason), and believing
17   8”,23|       universe, and declaring the Logos to be only the oral word,
18   8”,23|       among other things that the Logos (or rational faculty) served
19   8”,23|           he used to say that the Logos received a body without
20   8”,23|          to substance, of the God Logos — which is the same thing
21   8”,23|          the substance of the God Logos. For this property of substances
22   8”,23|          the substance of the God Logos which was given birth out
23   8”,23|           will, therefore not the Logos of God that was born, but
24   8”,23|      natural free choice, had the Logos of God following (i.e.,
25   8”,23| concerning the two natures of the Logos incarnate, on account of
26   8”,23|         other words, that the God Logos became a human being only
27   8”,23| characteristic peculiarity of the Logos functioning to bring about
28   8”,23|        about that which is of the Logos, while the body executes
29   8”,23|          Accordingly, just as the Logos is inseparable from the
30   8”,23|          the beginning He was the Logos, and the Logos was with
31   8”,23|         He was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos
32   8”,23|       Logos was with God, and the Logos was God; while He is a human
33   8”,23|         respect, to wit, that the Logos became flesh and dwelt among
34   8”,23|        same time flesh of the God Logos, according to another theologian).
35   8”,23|         the hypostasis of the God Logos. That is why there is but
36   8”,23|        calls the union of the God Logos with the human being a relative
37   8”,23|          took that of the Son and Logos in relation to God the Father).
38   8”,23|         Incarnation of the divine Logos (p. 905 of Vol. II of the