Council,  Canon

 1 Intro  | containing the Syriac translation mentioned above has been published
 2   1”,14|        these persons are likewise mentioned in c. VI of Timothy.[29]
 3   2”,2 |      Egypt (the Council expressly mentioned the bishop of Alexandria
 4   4”,6 |      church of some martyr, to be mentioned by the prelate in the course
 5   4”,6 |        monastery is not specially mentioned, as required by the terms
 6   4”,24|      penalties? They are the ones mentioned by the 7th Ec. C. in its
 7   7”,2 |          of the Canons previously mentioned, or to accept others instead
 8   7”,3 |         in holy orders previously mentioned, henceforth renew, or, in
 9   7”,5 |          housemaid except persons mentioned in the Canon as being above
10   7”,31|     Carthage, too, thus expressly mentioned that in the holy elements
11   7”,76|       This disorderly act is also mentioned by Epiphanius (Haer. 30)
12   7”,95|       that as regards the topknot mentioned in Leviticus, Symmachus
13   8”,23|           of their beauty we have mentioned; in fact they get to be
14   8”,23|         This appellation was also mentioned in the Council held in Chalcedon;
15   8”,23|           fact that the one first mentioned (i.e., the so-called Pope
16   8”,23|      inclusion “or Deacon,” as is mentioned in the Canon itself further
17   8”,23|         This percentage charge is mentioned also by divine Chrysostom,
18   8”,23|           definition and Tome are mentioned also by Theodoret (book
19   8”,23|        have stated, these Exarchs mentioned by the Canon were long ago
20   8”,23|        the ecclesiastical affairs mentioned here in the Canon, wherein
21   8”,23|         of the Faster, though not mentioned in this Canon (I don’t know
22   8”,23|         the time of Nectarius and mentioned in the present Canon, see
23   8”,23|       ahead of the priests, or be mentioned after the abbot in the divine
24   8”,23|          book of the Injunctions, mentioned by him, contains no reference
25   8”,23|   ministers of the divine service mentioned by St. Chrysostom in his
26   8”,23|       devout Dunale the confessor mentioned in the Synaxarist (December
27   8”,23|            But the Lord’s suppers mentioned in the present Canon were
28   8”,23|           have taken the Thursday mentioned here by the Canon to be
29   8”,23|      flesh) to be even so much as mentioned in print in the Menaea on
30   8”,23|                220] This Canon is mentioned also by George Cedrenus.
31   8”,23|      saying that no historian has mentioned them. Even Pope Adrian accepts
32   8”,23|      canon of the Sixth Ec. C. is mentioned also the the Seventh Ec.
33   8”,23|           that this same Canon is mentioned by Balsamon in his Reply
34   8”,23|          wonders why this Council mentioned here this Canon of the 2nd
35   8”,23|         dedication, it is neither mentioned in the Euchologion nor known
36   8”,23|        and departure, however, is mentioned by the same Saint: reason
37   8”,23|           say, the reason we have mentioned (but if on account of the