Council,  Canon

 1   2”,2 |    Bishop of Alexandria with his party cooperated to have Maximus
 2   3”,1 |         say, and of John and his party, or that intends to join
 3   3”,3 |      orders by Nestorius and his party on account of their believing
 4   7”,71|     religion, but afterwards one party believed in Christ, while
 5   7”,71|   infidelity, though the infidel party is still pleased to cohabit
 6   7”,71|       cohabit with the believing party, let the couple not be separated,
 7   7”,71|      such cohabitation the other party may be led to piety. “For
 8   8”,23|    learned that Eusebius and his party were troubling the church
 9   8”,23|     Canons and with the laws, no party having any right to object
10   8”,23|    uniikeness of religion), that party ought to have control who
11   8”,23|       many witnesses. But if one party of the couple, the husband,
12   8”,23|        stubbornly than the other party, being more solicitous of
13   8”,23| following interpretation. If one party is at odds with the other,
14   8”,23|         adds, however, that that party who was prevented from taking
15   8”,23|       Armentarius, says that one party cannot become a monk or
16   8”,23|          and desire of the other party. But if one, contrary to
17   8”,23|        to reunite with the other party. Accordingly divine Jerome (
18   8”,23|     express the opinion that one party to a marriage may marry
19   8”,23|       the Fathers, but allow one party to become a monk or nun
20   8”,23|         there be of the Orthodox party with the heretic? But if
21   8”,23|    Latins to begin with, and one party afterwards takes to Orthodoxy,
22   8”,23|          Leo decrees that if one party of a matrimonial couple
23   8”,23|          couple be enslaved, the party who remains free cannot
24   8”,23|       has a right to recover the party who has been enslaved when