Council,  Canon

 1   3    |    destitute of the assumption of humanity. That is to say, he divided
 2   3    |           Son, of divinity and of humanity, through and by virtue of
 3   4    |           and perfect the same in humanity. Truly a God, and truly
 4   4    |        same with us as respecting humanity, in all respects like us,
 5   4    |         and Theotoke, as respects humanity, the same for us and for
 6   6    |      neither the Divinity nor the humanity, the two natures of Christ,
 7   6    |          due to the energy of the humanity. And conversely, the first
 8   6    |        first will was that of the humanity, while the second will was
 9   8”,23|           human nature (i.e., His humanity as distinguished from His
10   8”,23|          of Her and which assumed humanity; and the other way is on
11   8”,23|          way is on account of the humanity assumed, which became deified
12   8”,23|           latter affiims the true humanity of Christ, and His two natures;
13   8”,23|         existent divinity and the humanity assumed at a later time.
14   8”,23|         denotes the fact that the humanity had not been previously
15   8”,23| implication that the union of the humanity, or human nature, in connection
16   8”,23|           as the divinity and the humanity. Instead, with the adjective
17   8”,23|     essence with us as respecting humanity. From this Monophysite named
18   8”,23|    according to the Monophysites, humanity was converted into divinity.
19   8”,23|           depicted as that of His humanity had been mingled and converted
20   8”,23|       only in connection with the humanity of Christ, since all the
21   8”,23|          and there was not in His humanity a different belief of the
22   8”,23|         acting through and by His humanity; whereas, on the other hand,
23   8”,23|            on the other hand, the humanity, having its own self under
24   8”,23|         as respects the nature of humanity. An artistic picture, on