Council,  Canon

 1   3    |       motherless with respect to essence, and fatherless with respect
 2   4    |         at the same time of like essence with the Father as respecting
 3   4    | respecting divinity, and of like essence the same with us as respecting
 4   7”,1 | thearchic nature are of the same essence, without allowing this important
 5   7”,1 |         other words, of the same essence and nature), and by the
 6   8”,2 |    Areopagite[267] declares, the essence and structure of the ecclesiastical
 7   8”,23|        draw a distinction of the essence, rank, and honor belonging
 8   8”,23|       Son, being as It is of the essence of God, not a Son, but being
 9   8”,23|          not a Son, but being in essence a God, as being of that
10   8”,23|          being of that very same essence that God the Father is of,
11   8”,23|       whom It really derives Its essence.” That it was only in regard
12   8”,23|         to the Son in respect of essence” (which is the same as to
13   8”,23|       say that It is of the same essence, or co-essential. Accordingly,
14   8”,23|     co-essential, or of the same essence.” So that inasmuch as Nestorius
15   8”,23|       kind and the difference in essence of the two conjoined natures,
16   8”,23|   compositive itself in point of essence and substance in the sense
17   8”,23|        is also defined to denote essence, and nature together with
18   8”,23|         Lord was not of the same essence, or co-essential, with the
19   8”,23|         is of the like (or same) essence with the Father as respecting
20   8”,23|        and of like (or the same) essence with us as respecting humanity.
21   8”,23|          wont to assert a common essence and nature, individualized
22   8”,23|         of ectoplasm, or an airy essence. The said John, on the other
23   8”,23|         to and in respect of its essence differs from the original,
24   8”,23|     respect to and in respect of essence, but with respect to and