Council,  Canon

 1   2”,5 |      concerning the Tome of the Westerners, we have accepted also those
 2   2”,5 |        accepted the Tome of the Westerners, that is to say, the definition
 3   6    |        bishops representing the Westerners who were assembled at that
 4   8”,23|      spite of all this, all the Westerners concurred then and concur
 5   8”,23|      from Philippoupolis to the Westerners to deny Athanasius and Paul
 6   8”,23|         coessentiality. But the Westerners replied to them that they
 7   8”,23| returned to Philippoupolis. The Westerners, though left alone, went
 8   8”,23|     Canon calls the Tome of the Westerners alone, and not of the Easterners,
 9   8”,23|   likewise by the Church of the Westerners, which ought not to have
10   8”,23|         schism, or split of the Westerners and the Easterners and to
11   8”,23|        and other books. But the Westerners argue captiously that just
12   8”,23|   neither did the Church of the Westerners sin by permitting this addition.
13   8”,23|        Hence by consequence the Westerners’ addition in the Creed is
14   8”,23|       again: “And to pardon the Westerners, therefore, would be unpardonable
15   8”,23|        chasm between us and the Westerners. But why should I be telling
16   8”,23|       the Apostle Peter, as the Westerners say, but originally and
17   8”,23|         papalethra; whereas the Westerners, because they affect this
18   8”,23|       as I am told, also by the Westerners), who with great industry
19   8”,23|       head — in vogue among the Westerners, though a canonical custom,
20   8”,23|      said it is proved that the Westerners are acting contrary to the