bold = Main text
Book, Paragraph grey = Comment text
1 Pre, 0(8) | Martyrs of Palestine. The passage is, as found in our MS.,
2 Pre | because the nature of the passage occasionally required this. ~
3 1, 37(29) | ministry to the whole. A passage similar to this is also
4 1, 37(30) | 3 This passage has been introduced into
5 1, 52(48) | 3 There is a passage in Plutarch very nearly
6 2, 3(3) | Eusebius was no Arian. A passage, similarly strong, is to
7 2, 7(5) | recension of these Deities. Our passage, however, is found ib. cap.
8 2, 11(9) | Deity. From the following passage of Lactantius (Lib. it.
9 2, 12(16) | accounted for by him. The passage is found in "Euseb. Orat.
10 2, 14(25) | here; but. recurs to this passage, ib. p. 534. D. ~
11 2, 19(34) | cap. viii. And the whole passage from Plutarch, ib. Lib.
12 2, 21(50) | and believers. The first passage occurs in Deut. xxxii. 22—
13 2, 27(64) | 3 This passage occurs in the Prep. Lib.
14 2, 29(65) | 1 This passage occurs in the sixth Epistle
15 2, 30(66) | 2 The passage here imitated is cited by
16 2, 30(67) | perhaps, the following passage of Origeri against Celsus, (
17 2, 32(70) | think, that Eusebius had a passage, in a work ascribed to Justin
18 2, 36(74) | 3 This appears to be the passage cited from the Apology of
19 2, 39(76) | introduces a part of this passage;...[Greek]...which, he says,
20 2, 39(76) | Cherubim of Scripture. This passage, occurring amongst the most
21 2, 44(81) | perhaps, here made to a passage in the Timaeus, (Edit. Lond.
22 2, 52(97) | 2 [...] There is another passage in Plutarch, which speaks
23 2, 52(97) | It should seem from a passage in Diog. Laert. that it
24 2, 55(103)| Porphyry,—from whom this passage is taken (Prep. Evang. Lib.
25 2, 56(106)| exact translation of the passage preserved in Eusebius (Prep.
26 2, 64(116)| 17 [...] This passage is also given in the Prep.
27 2, 66(125)| Theodoret, when he wrote the passage, (Serm. x. de Oraculis,
28 2, 69(129)| best editions here. The passage is alluded to, and commented
29 2, 79(137)| does, nevertheless, give a passage from Porphyry, (Prep. Evang.
30 3, 13(13) | Ib. p. 624, he cites a passage from Plutarch (De defectu
31 3, 13(17) | i. 24; Luke iv. 34. Our passage, however, agrees with neither
32 3, 29(29) | xiii. 9: Luke xxi. 12. The passage however, does not appear
33 3, 71(100)| But the most remarkable passage to this effect occurs in
34 4, 2(3) | Syriac]) from the parallel passage in Luke vii. 2. It differs
35 4, 8(23) | existence of this work. All the passage in the Chronicon intends
36 4, 11(30) | Matt. xvi. 15. seq. As this passage is important, I give the
37 4, 11(30) | Justin Martyr takes this passage in the same way : (Dialog.
38 4, 12(33) | cap. xxv. seq. -- As this passage of the Gospel (so called)
39 4, 12(33) | Eusebius does here cite this passage as worthy of credit, although
40 4, 12(34) | 2 The passage differs here from the citation
41 4, 18 | persons who interpret the passage before us differently, --
42 4, 21 | were after she left the passage (of the Jordan) and came
43 4, 28(105)| interpretation. The intention of the passage seems to be, -- what indeed
44 4, 32(123)| method of interpreting the passage referred to : which he says
45 4, 33(125)| generally referred this passage to Christ, just as Eusebius
46 4, 34(130)| that Eusebius cited the passage from memory: a thing very
47 4, 35(140)| Origen probably grounded on a passage in the Recognitions ascribed
48 5, 38(69) | which it is found. The whole passage is also found, with some
49 5, 40(78) | good explanation of this passage. It is also cited Prep.
50 5, 44(87) | Hudson, p. 798. where the passage is thus given, [Greek].
51 5, 44(87) | Syrian translator. This passage is cited by Eusebius both
52 5, 44(87) | very common to suspect this passage as spurious, or as partly
|