bold = Main text
   Book, Paragraph                                 grey = Comment text

 1 Pre         |    Theophilus of Antioch, Tatian, Origen, Clemens Alexandrinus, and
 2 Pre         |       Martyr, Tatian, Tertullian, Origen, Clemens Alexandrinus, Arnobius,
 3   1, 63(53) |   pronunciation of certain words. Origen (contra Cels. Lib. v. pp.
 4   1, 64(55) |            2 According to Celsus (Origen contra Cels. Lib. vii. p.
 5   1, 72(63) |           been able to ascertain. Origen tells us in his 24th Hom,
 6   1, 72(63) |            See Spencer's Notes on Origen contra Cels. pp. 47—50:
 7   1, 72(63) |            80, below: and so does Origen contra Cels. Lib. iv. p.
 8   2, 15(28) |           xii. cap. xlix. p. 618. Origen contra Cels. Lib. vii. p.
 9   2, 21(46) |        See also Spencer's note on Origen contra Cels. Lib. i. p.
10   2, 21(52) |           near the beginning: and Origen contra Cels. Lib. iv. p.
11   2, 29(65) |       Strom. v. pp. 436, 698: and Origen contra Celsum Lib. vi. p.
12   2, 30(68) |        See also Spencer's note on Origen (contra Cels. Lib. vi. p.
13   2, 41(78) |          the notes: cited also by Origen contra Cels. Lib. vi. p.
14   2, 50(91) |       Syriac]. To the same effect Origen contra Cels. Lib. in. p.
15   2, 50(93) | particularly valuable: as is also Origen's account of them, (contra
16   2, 60(109)|          note on these mysteries. Origen contra Cels. p. 8. line
17   2, 69(129)|          place,) as it also is in Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
18   2, 81(146)|           iv. cap. x. p. 361, and Origen contra Cels. Lib. v. p.
19   2, 81(157)|         ii. p. mihi 499. See also Origen contra Cels. Lib. v. p.
20   2, 94(172)|              1 To the same effect Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
21   3, 2(7)   |         these places are cited by Origen, Philocalia, cap. i. p.
22   3, 27(26) |       Jerusalem, will be found in Origen's Philocalia, cap. i. Edit.
23   3, 71(100)|        the Old Testament. So also Origen contra Cels. Lib. viii.
24   4, 8(23)  |          cap. x. p. 163. See also Origen contra Cels. Lib. v. p.
25   4, 20(66) |           21. [...] Cited also by Origen (contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
26   4, 20(68) |          Lib. vii. p. 321. D. and Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
27   4, 35(140)|        the sect of the Pharisees. Origen however affirms, that he
28   4, 35(140)|           to be the Christ. This, Origen probably grounded on a passage
29   4, 36(146)|                        7 Cited by Origen (contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
30   4, 36(147)|         This argument is urged by Origen (contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
31   5, 2(2)   |         often advanced by Celsus, Origen contra Cels. Lib. i. pp.
32   5, 2(2)   |            and Spencer's notes on Origen contra Cels. Lib. i. p.
33   5, 14(15) |          vi. p. 129. C. Ed. 1628. Origen is, perhaps, the first among
34   5, 16(20) |         Book iv. sect. 31, above. Origen contra Cels. Lib. i. pp.
35   5, 24(36) |         not unlike this occurs in Origen, contra Cels. Lib. i. p.
36   5, 25(38) |        will generally be found in Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
37   5, 31(48) |                              9 So Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.
38   5, 48(99) |   argument is advanced by Celsus: Origen contra Cels. Lib. ii. p.