Part.Chapter.Topic.Paragraph

 1 2.1       |          and ways of integrating science, mysticism, technology and
 2 2.1       |          psychology, philosophy, science, and the counterculture
 3 2.1       |         an American historian of science, who saw a paradigm as “
 4 2.1       | reconcile these two visions.(19)~Science and technology have clearly
 5 2.1       |      facets of life as medicine, science, art and religion. Western
 6 2.1   (21)|          our cultural mentality. Science, the health professions,
 7 2.3.1     |          an unlimited process of science had to face a severe break
 8 2.3.1     |         while the omnipotence of science evaporated, so that the
 9 2.3.2     |         religion, philosophy and science.~3. “To investigate unexplained
10 2.3.2     |         that, for theosophists, 'science' meant the occult sciences
11 2.3.2     |      contemplative journey where science meets mysticism. The stress
12 2.3.4.3   |     paradigm” which contemporary science has opened up. “Science
13 2.3.4.3   |          science has opened up. “Science has given us insights into
14 2.4       |       and immanent, religion and science, differences between religions,
15 2.4       |     Western culture. Traditional science and medicine are felt to
16 7.2       |      increasing fragmentation in science and everyday life, “wholeness”
17 7.2       |       who offer a bridge between science and religion. Humanity is
18 9.1       |        Capra, The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising