Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 8 |         faithful counsel. For the word of God cannot be exiled
 2   1, 12|         the strict reason why the word essence is employed is because
 3   1, 17|          also begotten, using the word creation of the act of the
 4   1, 22|           personal meaning of the word Son: for while through mutual
 5   1, 23|          In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,
 6   1, 23|   beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
 7   1, 23|        Word was with God, and the Word was God, let him be anathema."~
 8   1, 24|         the Only-begotten God the Word is recognized even in the
 9   1, 25|          image of God, who is the Word, who is God with God in
10   1, 25|          which is both image, and Word, and God. For if He be proclaimed
11   1, 29|           King, Lord of Lord, the Word, the Wisdom, the Life, true
12   1, 29|           beginning with God, the Word of God, according to what
13   1, 29|       said in the Gospel, and the Word was God, through whom all
14   1, 33|     beginning with God as God the Word, the fact that He was brought
15   1, 34|         and invisible: who is the Word and Wisdom and Might and
16   1, 38|         and invisible. Who is the Word and Wisdom and Might and
17   1, 38|           the internal or uttered Word of God: let him be anathema.~
18   1, 38|            If any man hearing The Word was made Fleshthinks that
19   1, 38|         made Fleshthinks that the Word was transformed into Flesh,
20   1, 45|           the internal or uttered Word of God: let him be anathema."~
21   1, 46|        confess Him to be only the word, going forth as an utterance
22   1, 46|           the Father has as Son a word resembling any word we utter
23   1, 46|         Son a word resembling any word we utter in virtue of our
24   1, 46|        which asserts that God the Word. who was in the beginning
25   1, 46|   beginning with God, is only the word of a voice sometimes internal
26   1, 47|            If any man hearing The Word was made Flesh thinks that
27   1, 47|        made Flesh thinks that the Word was transformed into Flesh,
28   1, 48|         that in the fact that the Word was made Flesh, the Word,
29   1, 48|          Word was made Flesh, the Word, in becoming Flesh, has
30   1, 48|        Flesh what constituted the Word, nor has become transformed
31   1, 48|          so as to cease to be the Word; but the Word was made Flesh
32   1, 48|           to be the Word; but the Word was made Fleshin order that
33   1, 48|        might begin to be what the Word is. Else whence came to
34   1, 49|          is clearly shewn why the Word, though He was made Flesh,
35   1, 49|          the flesh, yet ú God the Word when made Flesh could not
36   1, 49|        endurance of pain. But the Word that was made Flesh, although
37   1, 49|       able to suffer, and yet the Word was not possible. Possibility
38   1, 49|          is immutable and yet the Word was made Flesh, such pains
39   1, 49|          though the Person of the Word had no infirmity or possibility.
40   1, 68|           it aids heresy when the word o0moou/sioj is left by itself,
41   1, 68|         possess. Consequently the word implies three things, one
42   1, 69|        impiously expressed, and a word be judged guilty of occasioning
43   1, 69|         that point: nor hold this word all important as though
44   1, 69|           did not exist where the word was not used. He will be
45   1, 70|         Let no one think that the word ought to be used by itself
46   1, 70|        unexplained. Otherwise the word o0moou/sioj is not used
47   1, 70|          In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was GodI will
48   1, 70|   beginning was the Word, and the Word was GodI will not hear Christ
49   1, 71|          likeness. Why should the word cause mutual suspicions,
50   1, 72|               72. But perhaps the word similarity may not seem
51   1, 72|        the other except by such a word? Or is to be like not tile
52   1, 78|        suffered? This is what the word leads us to believe. What
53   1, 78|       professing ignorance of the word o0moiou/sion. I do not greatly
54   1, 80|           because the use of this word led to the idea that there
55   1, 80|        heretic, also rejected the word o0moou/sion, on the ground
56   1, 80|       were compelled to adopt the word on account of those who
57   1, 80|          astonishment. For if the word o0moou/sion must be repudiated
58   1, 80|     novelty, I am afraid that the word o0moiou/sion which is equally
59   1, 82|      absurd to fear cavil about a word when the fact expressed
60   1, 82|         the fact expressed by the word presents no difficulty.
61   1, 82|     Council of Nicaea adopted the word o0moou/sion5 He who does
62   1, 82|           The Arians rejected the word, that God the Son might
63   1, 82|         we should now criticise a word which was then rightly adopted
64   1, 83|          not made: lest while the word born implies His divinity,
65   1, 83|         implies His divinity, the word made should imply He is
66   1, 83|           the meaning here of the word o0moou/sion) that the Son
67   1, 85| Samosatene was wrong in using the word o0moou/sion; does that make
68   1, 86|         to keep silence about the word o0moou/sion.' Against my
69   1, 86|       must keep silence about the word o0moiou/sion? I beseech
70   1, 87|   believed this before I knew the word o0moou/sion but it greatly
71   1, 87|         Arians may not impugn the word. Have we to fear that o0moiou/
72   1, 87|          a similar substance. The word o0moou/sion can be understood
73   1, 88|        say: `The ambiguity of the word o0moou/sion troubles and
74   1, 88|          by the inadequacy of the word o0moiou/sion. Many deceptions
75   1, 90|         fault can be found with a word which does no harm to the
76   1, 90|       religion. I do not know the word o0moiou/sion, or understand
77   1, 90|          when I had heard neither word, my belief was always such