Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 10|           it is affirmed that His birth is unknowable, we were commanded
 2   1, 11|           can any man declare the birth of the Son, of whom it is
 3   1, 16|          is connected the perfect birth of the undivided nature.
 4   1, 17|         she be also born? For all birth, of whatever kind, attains
 5   1, 17|        the work of might, not the birth of a nature from a nature
 6   1, 17|        excluding in her manner of birth every kind of corporeal
 7   1, 18|      might completely explain her birth. By speaking of creation
 8   1, 18|   explained the perfection of her birth: the former that the Father
 9   1, 20|     unlike His own, for a perfect birth manifests no diversity between
10   1, 20|         to Himself: for a natural birth does not admit of any dissimilarity
11   1, 20|           attribute to Him in the birth of His Only-begotten an
12   1, 22|                           22. But birth does not countenance this
13   1, 22|          differentiation excludes birth. For what is born has a
14   1, 22|           a father who caused its birth. Nor because the divinity
15   1, 22|      unbroken continuity. But the birth is perfect, and remains
16   1, 23|           the denial of the Son's birth as the result of an identity
17   1, 23|       nature through an essential birth: yet the similarity of nature
18   1, 23|          then the truth as to the birth supports the similarity
19   1, 23|           personal reality of the birth. Nor again does a profession
20   1, 26|           could be applied to the birth of the Son seemed to have
21   1, 26|    excluding times from the Son's birth it seemed to countenance
22   1, 26|         opinion that there was no birth, so that He whose birth
23   1, 26|           birth, so that He whose birth is not in times might be
24   1, 26|       dares to refer the timeless birth to the unique and singular
25   1, 26|       unborn; the first admits of birth (though outside time), the
26   1, 27|      beyond all time is a perfect birth which refutes the error
27   1, 30|      things that are formed, or a birth resembling other births,
28   1, 33|           the passions of a human birth and conception, so that
29   1, 33|           cause of its origin His birth does not differ from the
30   1, 33|      unable to change. For in His birth that nature from which He
31   1, 34|           the Son is incapable of birth; or that the Father begat
32   1, 35|       which He drew His permanent birth should be understood to
33   1, 37|          and the Son who comes to birth one God must be declared
34   1, 37|        the Son being incapable of birth: because the nature of the
35   1, 37|          draws its existence from birth. But the nature of the birth
36   1, 37|      birth. But the nature of the birth is in Him so perfect that
37   1, 38|           the Son is incapable of birth and without beginning, saying
38   1, 38|       there were two incapable of birth and unborn and without beginning,
39   1, 45|          of the Father and of the birth of the Son.~VIII. "If any
40   1, 58|          substance: but a perfect birth gave to the Son a nature
41   1, 59|         the ineffable and perfect birth of the Son it was neither
42   1, 59|        passion, gave to the Son a birth that conveyed the essence
43   1, 59|           the Son is incapable of birth and without beginning, speaking
44   1, 59|       there were two incapable of birth and unborn and without beginning,
45   1, 60|        the Son to be incapable of birth is the height of impiety.
46   1, 60|        cannot be two incapable of birth: because God is one (although
47   1, 60|       reason that incapability of birth is the only quality that
48   1, 60|        reason that He derives His birth from that essence which
49   1, 60|           the Son is incapable of birth in order to predicate one
50   1, 60|    predicate one God incapable of birth and consequently one God,
51   1, 61|         Son of God dated from His birth of Mary. According to evangelical
52   1, 64|        there are two incapable of birth, because God is one through
53   1, 64| prerogative of being incapable of birth; nor does it follow that
54   1, 67|       true character of the Son's birth and by their natural likeness
55   1, 68|          there room for the Son's birth? Where is the Father or
56   1, 68|          are explained not by the birth of the divine nature but
57   1, 69|            He is not incapable of birth but equally eternal. He
58   1, 70|          We must first preach the birth and subordination of the
59   1, 71|      about it. You believe in the birth and you believe in the likeness.
60   1, 73|          that Seth had not at his birth the natural essence of Adam?
61   1, 73|          by virtue of his natural birth is the equal of his father,
62   1, 87|            and that the Son has a birth which is unique, of the