Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 13|    figured and indistinguishable likeness of one thing equated with
 2   1, 15|    Father's forth by the perfect likeness of the nature imaged in
 3   1, 15|    essence, He there signifies a likeness of essence to essence."~
 4   1, 16|     there is no diversity in the likeness of the essence that is born
 5   1, 16|         begat Him of Himself, in likeness to His own nature, He in
 6   1, 16|        in whom is the unbegotten likeness did not relinquish the property
 7   1, 16|      understand this begat me of likeness of essence, but says that
 8   1, 18|         one grant the Son only a likeness of activity, but rob Him
 9   1, 18|     activity, but rob Him of the likeness of essence which is the
10   1, 18|    Himself reveals His essential likeness with the Father in the words,
11   1, 18|          Himself, as well as His likeness in activity by teaching
12   1, 22|         for while through mutual likeness one differs in no respect
13   1, 22|         the other, yet this very likeness, which does not admit of
14   1, 22|        the Son is the changeless likeness of the Father. For the Son
15   1, 22|          Father according to the likeness which belongs to an identical
16   1, 23|        the cloak of an essential likeness, and against the denial
17   1, 23|         in Father and in Son the likeness of an identical nature through
18   1, 25|                25. The essential likeness conformed to the Father'
19   1, 25|       the truth of the image and likeness: for that is no longer likeness
20   1, 25|  likeness: for that is no longer likeness which is found to be dissimilar
21   1, 27|       Father in virtue of a real likeness, and does not differ in
22   1, 27|        nature: there, though the likeness of nature is the same in
23   1, 27|        qualities which mark this likeness are repugnant to a confusion
24   1, 32|        unity of essence based on likeness of substance.~
25   1, 67|     understanding it to mean the likeness of natural qualities and
26   1, 67|     natural qualities and such a likeness as includes not only the
27   1, 67|     exact similarity so that the likeness may be called an equality,
28   1, 67|       birth and by their natural likeness is so free from difference
29   1, 70| subordination of the Son and the likeness of His nature, and then
30   1, 71|     birth and you believe in the likeness. Why should the word cause
31   1, 73|      else than that He is equal. Likeness means perfect equality,
32   1, 73|         and according to his own likeness; and called his name Seth
33   1, 73|       what was the nature of his likeness and image which Adam begot
34   1, 73|         need. I ask whether this likeness which exists in Seth differs
35   1, 73|   essence of Adam? Nay, he had a likeness to Adam, even though we
36   1, 73|          was not different. This likeness of nature in Seth was not
37   1, 73|         father, so we see that a likeness of nature renders things
38   1, 73|        things equal because this likeness betokens an exactly similar
39   1, 73|         in that he has a natural likeness to him. And with regard
40   1, 73|    blessed John teaches the very likeness which Moses says existed
41   1, 73|         between Seth and Adam, a likeness which is this equality of
42   1, 73|  According to Moses, Seth is the likeness of Adam, according to John,
43   1, 74|         are some who confess the likeness, but deny the equality.
44   1, 74|          is a difference between likeness and equality, I ask whence
45   1, 74|          any other than His own. Likeness then is the sharing of what
46   1, 75|   sanction no difference between likeness and equality, since both
47   1, 75|          likewiseSurely then the likeness implies equality. Certainly
48   1, 75|         other difference between likeness and equality, when things
49   1, 76|         76. Therefore, brethren, likeness of nature can be attacked
50   1, 76|          He is like Him. No real likeness exists where there is no
51   1, 88|         drawn from a sheep. True likeness belongs to a true natural
52   1, 88|         sion is implied. It is a likeness according to essence when