Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 15|   disssimilar in genus; since the similarity of a Son begotten of the
 2   1, 19|         while they deprive Him of similarity of nature. This is foolish
 3   1, 19|           the Son likewise.~No, a similarity of nature follows on a similarity
 4   1, 19| similarity of nature follows on a similarity of might when He says, As
 5   1, 19|        the Father hath. Therefore similarity of life contains similarity
 6   1, 19|       similarity of life contains similarity of might: for there cannot
 7   1, 19|        might: for there cannot be similarity of life where the nature
 8   1, 19|           So it is necessary that similarity of essence follows on similarity
 9   1, 19|  similarity of essence follows on similarity of might: for as what the
10   1, 19| statements of those who confess a similarity of might but have dared
11   1, 21|     theory that in virtue of this similarity the Son is the same Person
12   1, 21|        Father: for this undivided similarity appears to countenance a
13   1, 22|     anathema who shall proclaim a similarity of nature in the Father
14   1, 23|          essential birth: yet the similarity of nature does not injure
15   1, 23|        Nor do we do away with the similarity of nature by admitting distinct
16   1, 23|         to the birth supports the similarity of essence and the similarity
17   1, 23|     similarity of essence and the similarity of essence does not undermine
18   1, 23|        and the Begotten exclude a similarity of essence; for while the
19   1, 31|           enough of the identical similarity of the Father and the Son,
20   1, 36|      bishops the creed guards the similarity of the nature begotten and
21   1, 40|           in years, and that very similarity between the sole-existing
22   1, 42|          name on account of their similarity of nature seemed to offer
23   1, 42|       which is based on the exact similarity of their natural essence,
24   1, 64|         that they are through the similarity of an identical nature one,
25   1, 67|          By equality I mean exact similarity so that the likeness may
26   1, 72|          72. But perhaps the word similarity may not seem fully appropriate.
27   1, 72|          enquire whether it means similarity rather than singularity.
28   1, 72|           things unlike, nor does similarity exist in one. What is the
29   1, 80|         latter, which implies the similarity of essence, our opinions
30   1, 88|         Many deceptions come from similarity. I distrust vessels plated
31   1, 90|         it, unless it confesses a similarity of essence. I call the God