Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 11|         But since some or many persons were disturbed by questions
 2   1, 11|    doctrine that there are two Persons of Father and Son; and that
 3   1, 20|       names are titular if the Persons have a distinct nature of
 4   1, 23|    repudiation of the unity of persons on the ground that the Father
 5   1, 23|        He who was sent are two Persons (for the Sent and the Sender
 6   1, 26|     the heresy of the unity of Persons should insinuate itself,
 7   1, 27|    repugnant to a confusion of Persons, so that there is not one
 8   1, 29|   teach us that they are three Persons, but in agreement one.~
 9   1, 31|   teach us that they are three Persons, but in agreement one.~
10   1, 32|       meaning three subsistent Persons, and not thereby introducing
11   1, 33|   since the perfection of both Persons is the same. King of King.
12   1, 57|      substance between the two Persons.~XXIV. "If any man says
13   1, 64|      similar substance in both Persons. There is not one name of
14   1, 68| substance, which the two equal Persons both possess. Consequently
15   1, 68|     original substance and two Persons, who are as it were fellow-heirs
16   1, 68|      to them, so the two equal Persons might appear to be sharers
17   1, 71|     division, any confusion of Persons, any sharing of an anterior
18   1, 71|   imply a blasphemous unity of Persons. Let the oneness be due
19   1, 71|    fact that there are similar Persons and not a solitary Person.~
20   1, 72| undifferentiated: if I say the Persons are similar, I mean that
21   1, 78|       mean that there were two Persons who suffered? This is what
22   1, 80|      prior substance which two Persons had divided between themselves.
23   1, 80|       error of confounding the Persons and denying the personal
24   1, 83|  substance divided between two Persons, but the Son born of the