Part, Paragraph

 1   1, 67|         monad but of equals. By equality I mean exact similarity
 2   1, 67|       likeness may be called an equality, provided that the equality
 3   1, 67|     equality, provided that the equality imply unity because it implies
 4   1, 72|       ask how I can express the equality of one Person with the other
 5   1, 72|        rather than singularity. Equality does not exist between things
 6   1, 73|          Likeness means perfect equality, and this fact we may gather
 7   1, 73|        a likeness which is this equality of nature. He says, Therefore
 8   1, 74|      the likeness, but deny the equality. Let them speak as they
 9   1, 74| difference between likeness and equality, I ask whence equality can
10   1, 74|      and equality, I ask whence equality can be obtained? If the
11   1, 74|         sharing of one's own is equality, and equality admits of
12   1, 74|      one's own is equality, and equality admits of no differenceThose
13   1, 74|       by unity of Person but by equality of nature.~
14   1, 75| difference between likeness and equality, since both Moses and John
15   1, 75|       Father and Son, the Son's equality of power with the Father
16   1, 75|       then the likeness implies equality. Certainly it does, even
17   1, 75|       not the same things admit equality? Is there any other difference
18   1, 75| difference between likeness and equality, when things that are done
19   1, 76|        exists where there is no equality of nature, and equality
20   1, 76|         equality of nature, and equality of nurture cannot exist