| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] something 5 sometimes 5 somewhat 1 son 343 sons 1 sonship 3 soon 3 | Frequency [« »] 585 to 572 is 420 in 343 son 331 god 318 father 297 be | St. Hilary of Poitiers On the Councils, or the Faith of the Easterns IntraText - Concordances son |
Part, Paragraph
1 1, 10| all things, and deny the Son to be God: and while they 2 1, 10| determined that God the Son should be asserted to be 3 1, 10| majesty, they implied that the Son lacked those things which 4 1, 11| whole world; and His only Son Jesus Christ our Saviour, 5 1, 11| declare the birth of the Son, of whom it is written, 6 1, 11| Father knows how He begot the Son, and the Son how He was 7 1, 11| He begot the Son, and the Son how He was begotten of the 8 1, 11| Father is greater than the Son in honour, dignity, splendour, 9 1, 11| very name of Father, the Son Himself testifying, He that 10 1, 11| two Persons of Father and Son; and that the Father is 11 1, 11| is greater, and that the Son is subordinated to the Father, 12 1, 11| impassible, but that the Son has been begotten of the 13 1, 11| that the generation of this Son, as is aforesaid, no one 14 1, 11| His Father, And that the Son of God Himself, our Lord 15 1, 11| of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost . 16 1, 11| the Spirit, is through the Son: Who was sent and came according 17 1, 12| any one hearing that the Son is the image of the invisible 18 1, 12| confess that He is truly Son: let him be anathema."~ 19 1, 13| relationship of Father and Son as a matter of names, inasmuch 20 1, 13| Therefore the Father is, and the Son is, because the Son is the 21 1, 13| the Son is, because the Son is the image of the Father: 22 1, 13| And if any one hearing the Son say, As the Father hath 23 1, 13| also hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself, 24 1, 14| hearing that the Only-begotten Son is like the invisible God, 25 1, 14| invisible God, denies that the Son who is the image of the 26 1, 14| understood to include essence) is Son in essence, as though denying 27 1, 15| He is the Only-begotten Son of God and the image of 28 1, 15| made between Father and Son affecting their nature with 29 1, 15| similar genus, when the Son subsisting through the nature 30 1, 15| to be less because He is Son, nor the other to be greater 31 1, 15| He is Father; since the Son is the image of the Father 32 1, 15| since the similarity of a Son begotten of the substance 33 1, 15| diversity of substance, and the Son and image of the invisible 34 1, 15| and this is to be truly Son, to reflect the truth of 35 1, 15| also He hath given to the Son to have life in Himself; 36 1, 15| Himself; denies that the Son is like the Father even 37 1, 16| 16. With the Son's origin as thus stated 38 1, 16| to deny that the perfect Son of God was here signified 39 1, 16| God was here signified as Son under two different expressions, 40 1, 17| Those who say that the Son of God is only a creature 41 1, 17| impious statement that the Son is a creature, because Wisdom 42 1, 17| besets it. But because the Son of God was not begotten 43 1, 18| both in perfection: for the Son being born of God without 44 1, 18| changeless in Himself and the Son's Father by nature, so forms 45 1, 18| by nature, so forms the Son as to beget Him. Therefore 46 1, 18| has dared to aver that the Son of God is a creature is 47 1, 18| And if any one grant the Son only a likeness of activity, 48 1, 18| spite of the fact that the Son Himself reveals His essential 49 1, 18| also hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself, 50 1, 18| doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise, such a man robs 51 1, 18| is in the Father and the Son, and let him be anathema."~ 52 1, 19| wont only to grant that the Son is like the Father in might 53 1, 19| they cannot deny that the Son's power is the same, seeing 54 1, 19| doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.~No, a similarity 55 1, 19| also hath He given to the Son to have lift in Himself. 56 1, 19| what the Father does, the Son does also, so the life that 57 1, 19| has He has given to the Son to have likewise. Therefore 58 1, 19| that in the Father and the Son there is an identical divine 59 1, 19| there is a Father and a Son, says that the Father is 60 1, 19| against the essence of the Son and nullifying His true 61 1, 20| as the titles Father and Son, which they do not truthfully 62 1, 20| between the Father and the Son resembles that between the 63 1, 20| that the names Father and Son are rather titular than 64 1, 20| the Father is Father of a Son begotten of Himself and 65 1, 20| degenerated in begetting the Son. For so far as in them lies 66 1, 20| one understanding that the Son is like in essence to Him 67 1, 20| in essence to Him whose Son He is admitted to be, says 68 1, 20| admitted to be, says that the Son is the same as the Father, 69 1, 20| children that the incorporeal Son draws His life from the 70 1, 21| many heretics say that the Son is like the Father in divinity 71 1, 21| virtue of this similarity the Son is the same Person as the 72 1, 22| nature in the Father and the Son in order to abolish the 73 1, 22| personal meaning of the word Son: for while through mutual 74 1, 22| both the Father and the Son because the Son is the changeless 75 1, 22| and the Son because the Son is the changeless likeness 76 1, 22| likeness of the Father. For the Son is not part of the Father 77 1, 22| bearing, but as an incorporeal Son drawing His existence from 78 1, 22| never admitted to be the Son and the Son is never admitted 79 1, 22| admitted to be the Son and the Son is never admitted to be 80 1, 22| Father, when he says that the Son is other than the Father ( 81 1, 22| Father is one Person and the Son another, inasmuch as it 82 1, 22| qualities of the Father and the Son which in the Church must 83 1, 22| to exist, fear that the Son and the Father may sometimes 84 1, 22| therefore denies that the Son is like in essence to the 85 1, 23| against the denial of the Son's birth as the result of 86 1, 23| Father is one Person and the Son another, a preaching of 87 1, 23| preserve in Father and in Son the likeness of an identical 88 1, 23| one God should be called Son and Father to Himself. So 89 1, 23| Father of the Only-begotten Son at any point in times and 90 1, 23| not that the Only-begotten Son came into existence without 91 1, 23| being of the Father and the Son and faithfully has instructed 92 1, 24| impassible origin of the Son, yet He is not bound in 93 1, 24| times than His Only-begotten Son, and that the Son is younger 94 1, 24| Only-begotten Son, and that the Son is younger than the Father: 95 1, 25| there can be no times in the Son's existence in which He 96 1, 25| existence in which He was not Son. Wherefore we must neither 97 1, 25| the Father older than the Son nor the Son younger than 98 1, 25| older than the Son nor the Son younger than the Father: 99 1, 25| Person) of the Only-begotten Son derived from the Father 100 1, 25| though calling the Father Son: let him be anathema~~~~~~ 101 1, 26| applied to the birth of the Son seemed to have given an 102 1, 26| would be so limited if the Son were subjected to time), 103 1, 26| under the appellation of Son be proclaimed as both Father 104 1, 26| proclaimed as both Father and Son in a single and unique Person. 105 1, 26| excluding times from the Son's birth it seemed to countenance 106 1, 27| such decrees. There the Son is the perfect image of 107 1, 27| essence, the Person of the Son is not annihilated and confounded 108 1, 27| with the Father: there the Son is declared to be image 109 1, 27| has and the life which the Son has received, the Father 110 1, 27| life) from that which the Son received to have: there 111 1, 27| have: there the begotten Son is not a creature, but is 112 1, 27| belongs to the Father and the Son, so their essence admits 113 1, 27| Father by begetting the Son in no wise degenerates from 114 1, 27| is called both Father and Son: there, though it is piously 115 1, 27| a Father who sends and a Son who is sent, yet no distinction 116 1, 27| between the Father and the Son, the Sent and the Sender: 117 1, 27| limits of times: there the Son is not later in time: there 118 1, 27| refutes the error that the Son could not be born. ~ 119 1, 29| Christ, His Only-begotten Son, God through whom are all 120 1, 29| of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghostmanifestly, 121 1, 29| Father, and clearly of a Son who is truly Son, and a 122 1, 29| clearly of a Son who is truly Son, and a Holy Ghost who is 123 1, 30| space, or age before the Son was begotten, let him be 124 1, 30| if any one say that the Son is a formation like one 125 1, 31| similarity of the Father and the Son, especially in concluding 126 1, 31| concluding that the names Father, Son and Holy Ghost referred 127 1, 32| that the substance of the Son is unlike that of the Father, 128 1, 32| as to the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost; which 129 1, 32| called both Holy Ghost and Son. Consequently they declared 130 1, 32| substance of Father and Son. For the words to teach 131 1, 33| nature of the Father and the Son. For when it is said, God 132 1, 33| Father ever abides, the Son born of Him also subsists; 133 1, 33| is not changed; but the Son has maintained a changeless 134 1, 33| between the Father and the Son. The whole exposition of 135 1, 33| distinction between Father and Son, the Unborn and the Only-begotten, 136 1, 34| believe in His Only-begotten Son our Lord Jesus Christ, who 137 1, 34| But those who say that the Son of God is sprung from things 138 1, 34| He was neither Christ nor Son of God, or that He Himself 139 1, 34| Himself is the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost, or that 140 1, 34| Holy Ghost, or that the Son is incapable of birth; or 141 1, 34| that the Father begat the Son without purpose or will: 142 1, 35| those who said that the Son sprang from things non-existent, 143 1, 35| those who said that the Son was born of some other substance 144 1, 35| Only-begotten essence of the Son is generated neither from 145 1, 36| is any difference in the Son. For those are anathematized 146 1, 36| yet in such a way that the Son also is God, because in 147 1, 36| anathema who denies that the Son is God; it is fully shewn 148 1, 36| the Only-begotten God the Son, with no dissimilarity of 149 1, 37| the name of Father and of Son: since in the Father who 150 1, 37| Father who begets and the Son who comes to birth one God 151 1, 37| saints knows nothing of the Son being incapable of birth: 152 1, 37| because the nature of the Son only draws its existence 153 1, 38| named.~"And in His only Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who 154 1, 38| But those who say that the Son is sprung from things non-existent, 155 1, 38| that the Father and the Son are two Gods: let him be 156 1, 38| confess that Christ, God the Son of God, ministered to the 157 1, 38| if any man say that the Son born of Mary was, before 158 1, 38| was, before born of Mary, Son only according to foreknowledge 159 1, 38| substance of God makes the Son; or names Son His supposed 160 1, 38| makes the Son; or names Son His supposed expanded substance: 161 1, 38| If any man says that the Son of God is the internal or 162 1, 38| alone born of Mary is the Son: let him be anathema.~X. " 163 1, 38| man hearing that the only Son of God was crucified, says 164 1, 38| spoken by the Father to the Son, but by God to Himself: 165 1, 38| If any man says that the Son did not appear to Abraham, 166 1, 38| If any man says that the Son did not wrestle with Jacob 167 1, 38| spoken of the Father and the Son, but that the Father rained 168 1, 38| anathema. For the Lord the Son rained from the Lord the 169 1, 38| Lord, the Father and the Son are two Gods. because of 170 1, 38| For we do not make the Son the equal or peer of the 171 1, 38| Father, but understand the Son to be subject. For He did 172 1, 38| that the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost are one 173 1, 38| Paraclete is different from the Son; for He said, And the Father 174 1, 38| of the Father or of the Son: let him be anathema.~XXII. " 175 1, 38| that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are 176 1, 38| If any man says that the Son was made by the will of 177 1, 38| If any man says that the Son was born against the will 178 1, 38| necessity of nature to beget the Son: but as soon as He willed, 179 1, 38| If any man says that the Son is incapable of birth and 180 1, 38| beginning of all things, is the Son; but the Head or beginning 181 1, 38| that Christ who is God and Son of God, personally existed 182 1, 38| gain the name of Christ and Son and a beginning of His deity: 183 1, 39| But those who say that the Son is sprung from things non-existent, 184 1, 40| differ in time: therefore the Son like the Father is eternal. 185 1, 40| Father and the Only-begotten Son share all the same qualities. 186 1, 40| that the Father and the Son are two Gods: let him be 187 1, 40| Christ who is God and eternal Son of God ministered to the 188 1, 41| that the Father and the Son are two Gods, and it is 189 1, 41| accursed to deny that the Son is God, any opinion as to 190 1, 41| Father, from which God the Son of God was born before time. 191 1, 41| declare that Christ the Son of God is God, and between 192 1, 42| one in the Father and the Son having one name on account 193 1, 42| If any man say that the Son existed before Mary only 194 1, 43| that the God of us all, the Son of God, existed before He 195 1, 43| the Father predestined the Son to have existence some day 196 1, 43| know that the Only-begotten Son of God was born of the Father 197 1, 44| substance of God makes the Son, or names Son His expanded 198 1, 44| makes the Son, or names Son His expanded substance: 199 1, 45| manhood might be called Son. They denied that the Son 200 1, 45| Son. They denied that the Son who is perfect God born 201 1, 45| and of the birth of the Son.~VIII. "If any man says 202 1, 45| If any man says that the Son is the internal or uttered 203 1, 46| far as in them lies the Son of God, confess Him to be 204 1, 46| that God the Father has as Son a word resembling any word 205 1, 46| alone born of Mary is the Son: let him be anathema."~We 206 1, 46| cannot declare that the Son of God is born of Mary without 207 1, 47| anathema who says that the Son of God by Mary is man and 208 1, 47| being distinguished from the Son not under the head of nature 209 1, 48| man hearing that the only Son of God was crucified, says 210 1, 49| spoken by the Father to the Son, but by God to Himself: 211 1, 49| If any man says that the Son did not appear to Abraham 212 1, 49| If any man says that the Son did not wrestle with Jacob 213 1, 49| spoken of the Father and the Son, but says that the Father 214 1, 49| anathema. For the Lord the Son rained from the Lord the 215 1, 50| dare to assert that the Son of God did not exist before 216 1, 50| did not exist before the Son of the Virgin, and should 217 1, 50| passages which refer to the Son of God, and while applying 218 1, 50| deny the Person of the Son. The clearness of these 219 1, 50| Lord, the Father and the Son, are two Gods because of 220 1, 50| For we do not make the Son the equal or peer of the 221 1, 50| Father, but understand the Son to be subject. For He did 222 1, 51| refrain from making the Son equal and peer of the Father 223 1, 51| the Only-begotten God the Son is born, and draws His divine 224 1, 51| similar nature. That the Son is not on a level with the 225 1, 51| God and the Only-begotten Son of God is God, God is nevertheless 226 1, 51| subjection and dignity of the Son are both taught in that 227 1, 51| in that by being called Son He is made subject to that 228 1, 51| which belongs to Him whose Son He is, He is subject to 229 1, 51| that the Father and the Son are one Person: let him 230 1, 53| that He who was sent by the Son for our consolation is the 231 1, 53| Paraclete is different from the Son; for He said, And the Further 232 1, 54| Paraclete was sent by the Son, and at the beginning the 233 1, 54| is exactly similar, the Son has frequently called His 234 1, 54| opportunity of saying that the Son Himself is the Paraclete: 235 1, 54| of the Father or of the Son: let him be anathema."~ 236 1, 55| since the Father and the Son are everywhere declared 237 1, 55| of the Father or of the Son? But since this folly is 238 1, 55| that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are 239 1, 56| three Gods in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost? Nevertheless, 240 1, 57| we cannot deny that the Son of God is God. Nay, the 241 1, 57| is no God, cannot rob the Son of His divinity: because 242 1, 57| essence in the Father and the Son. The words, Beside Me there 243 1, 57| and also saying that the Son is God, our use of the same 244 1, 57| If any man says that the Son was made by the will of 245 1, 58| perfect birth gave to the Son a nature from a substance 246 1, 58| willed them to be: but the Son who is born of God has such 247 1, 58| nature unlike itself: but the Son begotten of God's substance 248 1, 58| If any man says that the Son was born against the will 249 1, 58| of nature, to beget Ills Son; but as soon as He willed, 250 1, 59| Since it was taught that the Son did not, like all other 251 1, 59| necessity of begetting the Son from Himself, as though 252 1, 59| He had brought forth the Son by a law of nature in spite 253 1, 59| and perfect birth of the Son it was neither mere will 254 1, 59| no passion, gave to the Son a birth that conveyed the 255 1, 59| If any man says that the Son is incapable of birth and 256 1, 59| beginning of all things, is the Son; but the Head or beginning 257 1, 60| 60. To declare the Son to be incapable of birth 258 1, 60| the Father is God and the Son of God is God) for the very 259 1, 60| to one Person only. The Son is God for the very reason 260 1, 60| rejects the idea that the Son is incapable of birth in 261 1, 60| Head of all things is the Son: but the Head of the Son 262 1, 60| Son: but the Head of the Son is God. And to one God through 263 1, 60| Christ, who is God and the Son of God, existed before time 264 1, 60| gain the name of Christ and Son and a beginning of His deity: 265 1, 61| that the beginning of the Son of God dated from His birth 266 1, 61| Jesus Christ, who is God and Son of God, cannot be separated 267 1, 64| therefore deny that the Son of God is also God; for 268 1, 64| because He is Father, the Son is not the less because 269 1, 64| not the less because He is Son. The difference is one of 270 1, 64| but do not deny that the Son is equally eternal. We assert 271 1, 64| that the Father is in the Son because the Son has nothing 272 1, 64| is in the Son because the Son has nothing in Himself unlike 273 1, 64| Father: we confess that the Son is in the Father because 274 1, 64| because the existence of the Son is not from any other source. 275 1, 67| substance of the Father and the Son to be one in such a spirit 276 1, 67| the true character of the Son's birth and by their natural 277 1, 68| substance to the Father and the Son to teach that there is a 278 1, 68| then though we confess the Son with our lips we do not 279 1, 68| that the Father and the Son constitute one undifferentiated 280 1, 68| portion of Himself to be His Son. That is what the heretics 281 1, 68| When the Father and the Son are said to be of one substance 282 1, 68| substance of the Father and the Son signifies either that there 283 1, 68| then is there room for the Son's birth? Where is the Father 284 1, 68| Where is the Father or the Son, if these names are explained 285 1, 69| substance of the Father and the Son is one, must not begin at 286 1, 69| is unbegotten, that the Son is born, that He draws His 287 1, 69| not the Father, but the Son begotten of Him. He is not 288 1, 69| substance of the Father and the Son. Nay, if he now denies the 289 1, 70| The hour is come that the Son of man should be glorified 290 1, 70| and subordination of the Son and the likeness of His 291 1, 70| that the Father and the Son are of one substance. I 292 1, 71| substance of the Father and the Son, but we must not declare 293 1, 73| brethren, in declaring that the Son is like in all things to 294 1, 73| thirty years, and begat a son according to his own image 295 1, 73| essence. Therefore every son by virtue of his natural 296 1, 73| nature of the Father and the Son the blessed John teaches 297 1, 73| according to John, the Son is equal to the Father, 298 1, 73| between the Father and the Son. He is like the Father, 299 1, 73| like the Father, He is the Son of the Father, He is born 300 1, 74| can be obtained? If the Son is like the Father in essence, 301 1, 74| one. So the Father and the Son are one, not by unity of 302 1, 75| would lead us to believe the Son is like the Father and also 303 1, 75| equal with God. He says, The Son can do nothing of Himself, 304 1, 75| not differ in Father and Son, the Son's equality of power 305 1, 75| differ in Father and Son, the Son's equality of power with 306 1, 75| increase or advance of the Son's nature but to the Father' 307 1, 75| short that honour which the Son's subjection retained for 308 1, 75| Father belongs equally to the Son on the strength of His nature. 309 1, 75| doeth, these also doeth the Son likewiseSurely then the 310 1, 75| for these also doeth the Son likewise. Are not things 311 1, 76| attacked by no cavil, and the Son cannot be said to lack the 312 1, 76| substance of the Father and the Son is one because it is similar, 313 1, 77| Christ was denied to be the Son of God according to His 314 1, 78| of the generation of the Son? If it cannot be expressed 315 1, 78| even this, that God the Son being born not of another 316 1, 78| Have they not read that the Son is to be honoured even as 317 1, 78| the Father is seen in the Son, that they make the Son 318 1, 78| Son, that they make the Son differ in dignity, splendour 319 1, 78| due to ignorance that the Son, like all other things, 320 1, 78| for the subjection of the Son is filial reverence, the 321 1, 78| whence they gathered that the Son jointly suffered? Can they 322 1, 78| words, Jesus Christ the Son of God? Is Jesus Christ 323 1, 78| Jesus Christ one, and the Son of God another? If the Son 324 1, 78| Son of God another? If the Son of God is not one and the 325 1, 80| account of those who said the Son was a creature: although 326 1, 81| both the Father and the Son? And who that has been reborn 327 1, 81| Christ and confessed both the Son and the Father will follow 328 1, 81| Himself both Father and Son? So in condemning the blasphemies 329 1, 82| rejected the word, that God the Son might not be asserted to 330 1, 83| that the Father and the Son divided and shared a previously 331 1, 83| our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, born of the Father, 332 1, 83| between two Persons, but the Son born of the substance of 333 1, 83| erroneous interpretation? The Son is declared to be born of 334 1, 83| divine Person, but that the Son is born of the substance 335 1, 83| word o0moou/sion) that the Son is produced of the Father' 336 1, 83| nature, the essence of the Son having no other origin, 337 1, 83| unvarying essence? As the Son's essence has no other origin, 338 1, 83| of one essence, since the Son could be born with no substance 339 1, 84| those who now affirm the Son to be a creature find it 340 1, 84| wish to declare that the Son is unlike the Father read: 341 1, 84| are in heaven, neither the Son, but the FatherWe must dispense, 342 1, 84| name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost, they 343 1, 87| divided but born, and that the Son has a birth which is unique,