Part, Paragraph

  1   1, 11|          by questions concerning substance, called in Greek ou0si/a,
  2   1, 12|    mention the words essence and substance, we must determine the meaning
  3   1, 12|          or nature, or genus, or substance of anything. And the strict
  4   1, 12|       But this is identical with substance, because a thing which is,
  5   1, 12|       permanent genus, nature or substance. When, therefore, we say
  6   1, 12|   signifies nature, or genus, or substance, we mean the essence of
  7   1, 12|         in the nature, genus, or substance. Now, therefore, let us
  8   1, 15|         of a Son begotten of the substance of His Father does not admit
  9   1, 15|        admit of any diversity of substance, and the Son and image of
 10   1, 15|          in the Father signifies substance, and the life of the Only-begotten
 11   1, 15|          also understood to mean substance or essence, He there signifies
 12   1, 16|          property of His natural substance. For He only has what He
 13   1, 18|          she also shews that the substance of her nature begotten of
 14   1, 19|     there is an identical divine substance.~VII. "And if any one professing
 15   1, 20|        called Father of an alien substance unlike His own, for a perfect
 16   1, 20|          itself and the original substance. Therefore we repudiate
 17   1, 25|          attributes the timeless substance (i.e. Person) of the Only-begotten
 18   1, 27|           and does not differ in substance from the Father, whose image
 19   1, 27|        have nothing different in substance (this being implied in life)
 20   1, 32|        dared to declare that the substance of the Son is unlike that
 21   1, 32|          essence to separate the substance of Father and Son. For the
 22   1, 32|        us that they are three in substance, but in agreement one, are
 23   1, 32|     essence based on likeness of substance.~
 24   1, 33|      this also from the Father's substance that He is unable to change.
 25   1, 33|      introduce any separation of substance between the Father and the
 26   1, 34|     non-existent or from another substance and not from God, and that
 27   1, 35|       understood to be any other substance than that of God, it also
 28   1, 35|       Son was born of some other substance and not of God. And so since
 29   1, 35|  non-existent nor from any other substance than the birthless and eternal
 30   1, 35|        the birthless and eternal substance of the Father. But the creed
 31   1, 36|         to God's true nature His substance does not admit a number
 32   1, 36|          their merit, though the substance of their nature and that
 33   1, 36|         character of the similar substance in each: since in confessing
 34   1, 37|          exist on account of the substance of their nature being similar
 35   1, 37|      that He who was born of the substance of God is born also of His
 36   1, 38|    non-existent, or from another substance and not from God, and that
 37   1, 38|         If any man says that the substance of God is expanded and contracted:
 38   1, 38|       man says that the expanded substance of God makes the Son; or
 39   1, 38|        Son His supposed expanded substance: let him be anathema.~VIII. "
 40   1, 39|    non-existent, or from another substance and not from God, and that
 41   1, 40|     existence. There is no other substance extant to be His origin,
 42   1, 41|       God, any opinion as to the substance of the one being different
 43   1, 42|          unity of name, that the substance of God is singular and undifferentiated
 44   1, 42|   account of the exactly similar substance of the undivided nature
 45   1, 43|  existent before the ages in the substance of the divine nature, and
 46   1, 43|         If any man says that the substance of God is expanded and contracted:
 47   1, 44|    Himself through any change of substance. Remaining free and outside
 48   1, 44|         to ascribe any change of substance to such an unfettered Power.~
 49   1, 44|       man says that the expanded substance of God makes the Son, or
 50   1, 44|        or names Son His expanded substance: let him be anathema."~
 51   1, 45|          God by expansion of His substance extended Himself as far
 52   1, 47|          and power of the divine substance. For since he is anathema
 53   1, 47|        nature or by diversity of substance, but only by such pre-eminence
 54   1, 48|          the prerogatives of His substance.~XII. "If any man hearing
 55   1, 57|        there is no difference of substance between the two Persons.~
 56   1, 58|        the will of God has given substance: but a perfect birth gave
 57   1, 58|          the Son a nature from a substance that is impossible and itself
 58   1, 58|        the Son begotten of God's substance has derived the essence
 59   1, 59|         natural law. Nor was any substance sought for to beget Him,
 60   1, 61|        or power or difference of substance or interval of time.~
 61   1, 64|         His source is the Unborn substance. There is not one subsistent
 62   1, 64| subsistent Person, but a similar substance in both Persons. There is
 63   1, 64|       account of the kind of His substance, but one is subject to the
 64   1, 67|    beloved brethren, declare the substance of the Father and the Son
 65   1, 67|   delusion. If we assert the one substance, understanding it to mean
 66   1, 67|          we believe that the one substance signifies such a similitude
 67   1, 67|        Person. Therefore the one substance will be asserted piously
 68   1, 67|    personality or divide the one substance into two, for their substance
 69   1, 67|    substance into two, for their substance by the true character of
 70   1, 68|          But if we attribute one substance to the Father and the Son
 71   1, 68|          since in confessing one substance we then really say that
 72   1, 68|  heretics mean when they say the substance is one: and the terminology
 73   1, 68|        Son are said to be of one substance this is thought to imply
 74   1, 68|         thought to imply a prior substance, which the two equal Persons
 75   1, 68|       three things, one original substance and two Persons, who are
 76   1, 68|         fellow-heirs of this one substance. For as two fellow-heirs
 77   1, 68|          sharers in one anterior substance. The assertion of the one
 78   1, 68|         The assertion of the one substance of the Father and the Son
 79   1, 68|       two titles, or one divided substance that has made two imperfect
 80   1, 68|      that there is a third prior substance which has been usurped and
 81   1, 68|          sharing of one anterior substance?~
 82   1, 69|          about to state that the substance of the Father and the Son
 83   1, 69|        safe in asserting the one substance if he has first said that
 84   1, 69|   another God in the kind of His substance, but the one God in virtue
 85   1, 69|   essence of His exactly similar substance. God is not one in Person
 86   1, 69|         not err in declaring one substance of the Father and the Son.
 87   1, 69|         if he now denies the one substance he sins.~
 88   1, 70|       were meant to deny the one substance. We are giving the very
 89   1, 70|    Father and the Son are of one substance. I do not personally understand
 90   1, 71|       not deny that there is one substance of the Father and the Son,
 91   1, 71|      giving our reasons. The one substance must be derived from the
 92   1, 71|       any sharing of an anterior substance. It may be right to assert
 93   1, 71|          right to assert the one substance, it may be right to keep
 94   1, 71|        and say that there is one substance, but in virtue of the true
 95   1, 76|          we do not deny that the substance of the Father and the Son
 96   1, 76|       meaning of the phrases one substance, in Greeko0moou/sion, and
 97   1, 76|    Greeko0moou/sion, and similar substance or o0moiou/sion, and shewing
 98   1, 78|        being born not of another substance but of God, has not an essence
 99   1, 80|      idea that there was a prior substance which two Persons had divided
100   1, 81|    declare that there is a third substance, which is common to both
101   1, 82|       asserted to be born of the substance of God the Father, but formed
102   1, 83|     o0moou/sion, that is, of one substance: not certainly to hatch
103   1, 83|     shared a previously existing substance to make it their own. It
104   1, 83|   Only-begotten, that is, of the substance of the Father, God of God,
105   1, 83|       God, born not made, of one substance with the Father (which in
106   1, 83|       existed not, or of another substance and essence, saying that
107   1, 83|          men introduces no prior substance divided between two Persons,
108   1, 83|          but the Son born of the substance of the Father. Do we, too,
109   1, 83|      says, Born not made, of one substance with the Father (which in
110   1, 83|       declared to be born of the substance of the Father, not made:
111   1, 83|       same reason we have of one substance, not to teach that there
112   1, 83|      that the Son is born of the substance of God and subsists from
113   1, 83|        caused by a difference of substance. Surely again this is our
114   1, 83|        Son could be born with no substance but that derived from the
115   1, 87|          which is unique, of the substance of the unborn God, that
116   1, 87|     being of one or of a similar substance. The word o0moou/sion can