bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter          grey = Comment text

 1  Con           vii    |    EARLIER APOLOGIES~§ 5. THE ARGUMENT OF THE THIRD BOOK~§ 6. THE
 2  Int,   1, p.    x    |       certain sections of the argument seem to be deliberately
 3  Int,   3, p.   xi    |       most modern part of the argument. By an elaborate rc.ditdio
 4  Int,   4, p.   xi    | systematic application of the argument from prophecy used by Justin
 5  Int,   4, p.   xi    |      of the Demonstratio, the argument in Book III, that Christ
 6  Int,   4, p.   xv    |   character. The heart of the argument is the connection of this
 7  Int,   5, p.   xv    |                        5. THE ARGUMENT OK THE THIRD BOOK~The Third
 8  Int,   5, p.   xv    |     of Christianity. It is no argument in the air, it comes down
 9  Int,   5, p.   xv    |   thinkers like Porphyry, the argument passes to the Miracles,
10  Int,   5, p.   xv    |      more academic work. ~Its argument may be summarized as follows: ~[[
11  Int,   5, p.   xx    |     to escape death. And this argument may be extended-in all ways
12  Int,   5, p.   xx    |      satirical touches of the argument. But it reveals on what
13  Int,   5, p.   xx    |  stand out. ~(i) There is the argument from Prophecy. It is fashionable
14  Int,   5, p.   xx    |    changed, there is still an argument from prophecy. The lines
15  Int,   5, p.   xx    |    may be doubted whether the argument from the simplicity and
16  Int,   7, p.   xx    |     are all incidental to the argument, and therefore doctrinally
17    I,   1, p.    5    |     whom they may enter on an argument, that it is by no means
18    I,   1, p.    6    |      the new with the old. My argument will dispense with a longer
19    I,  10, p.   56    |      up otherwise. And so the argument holds that the victims are
20   II, Pre, p.   62    |       object is to resume the argument at a point further back,1
21   II,   1, p.   64    |     reached that point of the argument, I think I shall have proved
22   II,   1, p.   64    |   then, as they always use in argument with us the prophecies about
23   II,   3, p.   77    |    what they say, so that the argument may be based on more evidence,
24  III,   4, p.  125    |      not to extend my present argument to too great length, to
25  III,   5, p.  128    |    Himself would come? But no argument can prove that so large
26  III,   5, p.  128    |    right and obvious and true argument; let us examine that which
27  III,   5, p.  132    |     all men, not by words and argument, but by the power of our
28  III,   5, p.  135    |     follow if for the sake of argument a ridiculous hypothesis
29  III,   5, p.  136    |     to what He taught. But my argument has been, of course, purely
30  III,   5, p.  136    |    supposition. ~This line of argument, then, being refuted, let
31  III           137(65)|      304). If this be so, the argument of E. as to Matthew's modesty
32  III,   6, p.  147    |       quite permissible. What argument, then, can rank the disciples
33  III,   6, p.  147    |      a sorcerer. ~But that my argument may not be based solely
34  III,   6, p.  150    |       more, let us follow the argument in this direction: You say,
35  III,   6, p.  154    |     pay any heed to temperate argument and logical consistency
36   IV,   6, p.  174    |       as the hypothesis of an argument, that the sun all-glowing
37   IV,   9, p.  180    |       who are strangers to my argument, which I drew upon in the
38   IV,  15, p.  203    |    inspired Scriptures, as my argument as it proceeds further will
39   IV,  17, p.  220    |   Saviour, I will take up the argument from another starting-point,
40    V, Int, p.  220    |    shame. ~This being so, the argument will proceed in its natural
41    V, Int, p.  222    |     it in this manner. If any argument could prove that the gods,
42    V, Int, p.  223    |       prophets of God? And my argument in The Preparation for the
43    V, Int, p.  228    |    not a far better and truer argument, which says that the Holy
44    V, Int, p.  229    |    such virtuous souls, as my argument just now described the Hebrew
45    V, Int, p.  229    |      take up the thread of my argument from the beginning, and
46   VI,  19, p.   37    |       295) clearly support my argument. (c)~
47   VI,  25, p.   47    |     as I shall show in my own argument.~As I have in this Book
48   IX,   2, p.  155    |     but if beyond all need of argument the truth is shewn by facts,
49   IX,   4, p.  159    |  consider the sequence of the argument, which implies that this
50   IX,  13, p.  178    |   miraculously and beyond all argument by the medicine of His teaching.
51    X, Int, p.  189    |       But before beginning my argument let me repeat what I have
52    X,   8, p.  216    |     apply to Him alone, as my argument will shew. But if any one