Book, Chapter

 1  Int,   6, p.   xx|  conservatism. That is to say, his theology was, allowing for the difference
 2  Int,   6, p.   xx|         ago by the Apologists. The theology based upon it stood not
 3  Int,   6, p.   xx| established and somewhat quiescent theology was exactly where Origen
 4  Int,   6, p.   xx|           from Arianism. Of such a theology the doctrinal parts of the
 5  Int,   6, p.   xx|               It is clear that the theology of Origen is presented here
 6  Int,   6, p.   xx|        point-of-view of a dominant theology in an assured tone. He speaks
 7  Int,   6, p.   xx|        both parties, embodied this theology. "It bears," says Dr. Bright, "
 8  Int,   6, p.   xx|  implications it was harmless. The theology of the Demonstratio shows
 9  Int,   6, p.   xx|           exponent of the Origenic theology without any violence to
10  Int,   6, p.   xx|        been the only wing of their theology, they might logically have
11  Int,   6, p.   xx|        however abstract his formal theology may be, understands quite
12  Int,   7, p.   xx|  sweet-smelling fruit of excellent theology, offering it by means of
13  Int,   9, p.   xx|         and shed the Light of True Theology. And how many Prophetic
14   II,   3, p.  100|          germane to the mysterious theology of His Person. ~(c) Now,
15  III           100|         the Hebrew prophets on the theology based on His Person, and
16  III,   2, p.  104|          first also to publish the theology of the one God, bidding
17  III,   2, p.  117|          that I will deal with the theology of His Person, so far as
18  III,   3, p.  119|         loftiest and the only true theology, to worship many gods? Remember
19  III,   3, p.  121|            is perfected. ~From the Theology of Apollonius of Tyana 36 (
20  III,   5, p.  128|           Why did they construct a theology about Him when He was dead?
21  III,   6, p.  150|         only, and base their whole theology on Christ. This, then, is
22  III,   7, p.  162|           handle the more mystical theology about Him, and consider
23   IV,   1, p.  162|           I mean the more mystical theology of His Person. ~Now common
24   IV,   3, p.  167|            must not admit into our theology of the Son: for He is (d)
25   IV,   3, p.  168|           whereas the scope of the theology we are considering far transcends
26   IV,   5, p.  170|        creative Word of God of our theology, Who is the Maker of the
27    V, Int, p.  227|           of God, and the loftiest theology of the Father and the Son,
28    V, Int, p.  229|            and holy and infallible theology, which no longer involves
29    V, Int, p.  229|            beginning, and rest the theology of our Saviour Jesus Christ
30    V, Int, p.  229|         Gospel evidence gives this theology of Christ: "In (d) the beginning
31    V, Int, p.  230|           Christ, agrees with this theology when he says this about
32    V,   1, p.  235|            Father." Since then the theology both of the Father and of
33    V,   8, p.  252|          Son. Wherefore a reverent theology in our opinion rightly recurs
34    V,  30, p.  270|       topic in connection with the theology of His Person, and prove
35   IX           149|      devoted myself to tracing the Theology of His Person, now to considering
36   IX,  12, p.  177|      appear to agree with orthodox theology to understand the oracle