bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter          grey = Comment text

 1  Int,   4, p.   xv    |    faith, and his allegorical method, are plainly those of Origen
 2  Int,   4, p.   xv    |       claim to originality of method. Eusebius contrasts the "
 3  Int,   4, p.   xv    |    little originality in this method of controversy. It had been
 4  Int,   4, p.   xv    |    hardly have meant that the method which he adopted was new
 5  Int,   4, p.   xv    |     dealt with Celsus. If the method of Origen had made a deep
 6  Int,   4, p.   xv    |       from Origen's. Origen's method was to follow every turn
 7  Int,   4, p.   xv    |    people of his own age. His method and manner are less perhaps
 8  Int,   5, p.   xx    | delusion. But yet, though the method is changed, there is still
 9  Int,   5, p.   xx    |    divine as well. It was the method of the Master Himself, and
10    I            xl    |       I propose to adopt this method. I propose to use as witnesses
11    I,   1, p.    5    |    accusers by a more logical method of proof, which slanderers
12  III           117(26)|      be approached by another method. To them E. must speak of
13  III           120(34)|      afterwards ridiculed his method (Eus., HE. vi. 19). He was
14  III,   4, p.  126    |       by the more logical (b) method which we are accustomed
15  III           126(46)|  still, and also by a logical method that should appeal to the