Paragraph

 1 4 |     which silently speaks with two mute tongues, one being
 2 7 |        the victory between the two of them. ~
 3 15|      true. For by means of the two former a man surely misses
 4 16|      one ox cannot plough with two thoughts. Just as it is
 5 16|       is useful to plough with two oxen, so it is right to
 6 17|        case that it is seeking two reasonings destructive of
 7 20|      of Freewill.~But if these two wise conclusions (namely)
 8 20|        though the Will is one, two opinions which are not homogeneous
 9 20|       single thing wills to be two it is easy for it, and when
10 20|    Will) is one, yet there are two opinions in it, that of
11 20|       For, lo, there are in it two opinions contending together,
12 20|       p. 36.] And though these two can be a single thing, yet
13 20|       they are divided and are two there can be no struggle
14 20|      And again, how when these two frames of mind have been
15 21| because there are in every one two Minds, [Ov. p. 37.] which
16 33|        behold, at the mouth of two or three witnesses is every
17 49| Refining and Separation of the two take place ? [Ov. p. 57.]
18 51|   against itself, or there are two Evils which are unlike one