| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] everything 24 evidence 1 evident 2 evil 149 evils 2 ex 1 exact 3 | Frequency [« »] 210 a 203 not 152 if 149 evil 140 but 136 which 127 by | St. Ephraim First to Hypatius against the False Teachers IntraText - Concordances evil |
bold = Main text
Paragraph grey = Comment text
1 9 | craftiness which ministers evil things should resemble it. ~
2 10| us is associated with an evil habit which helps it, then
3 10| themselves nigh to sinking into evil. But if any one say :—why
4 15| everything. we show our evil Will before Him Who knows
5 20| of the Will desires that Evil should be done, and again,
6 20| restraint and guards against Evil being done. And how on the
7 20| part of it which desires evil things that it may become
8 20| like its part which desires evil things ? and how again (
9 20| be converted to Good or Evil, what shall we call them ?
10 20| That we should call them Evil (is impossible, for) they
11 22| views about the origin of Evil make the Law an absurdity,
12 22| absurdity, or make Good akin to Evil.~But if the Evil which is
13 22| akin to Evil.~But if the Evil which is in us is evil,
14 22| the Evil which is in us is evil, and cannot become good,
15 22| good, and cannot become evil (then) these good and evil
16 22| evil (then) these good and evil promises which the Law makes
17 22| is obedient to something evil, how can we call that Good,
18 22| a close relationship to Evil ? For by means of that thing
19 22| whereby it becomes obedient to Evil its kinship with Evil is
20 22| to Evil its kinship with Evil is perceived. For that Evil
21 22| Evil is perceived. For that Evil would not be able to draw
22 22| affinity to the leaven of Evil. See therefore, also, that
23 22| is, convicted of being an evil Nature; inasmuch as it has
24 22| Nature; inasmuch as it has an evil Will which is drawn away
25 22| which is drawn away after Evil. But inasmuch as it has
26 22| But inasmuch as it has an evil Will, all Evil things had
27 22| it has an evil Will, all Evil things had a tendency towards
28 22| tendency towards it. [The evil Will is the root of Evil.]
29 22| evil Will is the root of Evil.] For there is nothing more
30 22| For there is nothing more evil than an evil Will. For that
31 22| nothing more evil than an evil Will. For that is the root
32 22| For that is the root of evil things. For when there is
33 22| things. For when there is no evil free Will, then evil things
34 22| no evil free Will, then evil things come to an end. For
35 22| cannot kill apart from the evil Will of its holder. [Ov.
36 23| is good, and part of it evil ?" we shall tell him that
37 28| Constituents of Good and Evil are mingled together in
38 29| from God, then the good and evil impulses which belong to
39 30| compels them to deny that Evil which they believe in. For
40 30| Constituents of Good and Evil stir in the Will, then it
41 32| permission, receives good and evil impulses, and He furthermore
42 33| day so that he is good or evil, hateful or pleasing, merciful
43 36| Constituents of Good and Evil overcome, and are overcome,
44 36| in a Mixing of Good and Evil, just as if they denied
45 36| they say that, when the evil Constituent is large, Freewill
46 37| change it; but it is an evil Constituent, the nature
47 37| changed by the Will the evil Nature which cannot be changed
48 37| Wills are changed to Good or Evil or let them admit that if
49 37| bound Natures' of Good and Evil, they are Natures which
50 38| not Weights of Good and Evil conquering one another and
51 38| can think a multitude of evil thoughts. Which one of these,
52 38| And if they say that the Evil was most (in amount), how
53 38| how then since all that Evil would be in the man did
54 38| good thoughts ? And if that Evil made room of its own Will,
55 38| room of its own Will, that Evil is good, which has this
56 38| good Will. For how did that Evil which, when it wished, finally
57 38| for the small amount of Evil to go up and show a great
58 38| victory ? If, therefore, the Evil submitted to give way before
59 38| way before the Good, the Evil is better than the Good,
60 38| consented to give place to the Evil that it (i.e., the Evil)
61 38| Evil that it (i.e., the Evil) might be victorious, the
62 38| victorious, the Good is more evil than the Evil in that it
63 38| Good is more evil than the Evil in that it gave place to
64 38| that it gave place to the Evil to do corruptly. ~
65 39| Constituents of Good and Evil neither outweigh one another,
66 39| Root which is in us, and evil Choices are produced in
67 39| produced in us from that evil Root which is in us, then
68 40| separate the good Will from the evil Will, but a strainer to
69 41| Freewill cannot alter visible Evil, how can it alter spiritual
70 41| how can it alter spiritual Evil, a bound Nature ?~But if
71 41| send out of themselves the evil Ingredient, that by (the
72 41| visible Mixing of the visible Evil we may believe that also
73 41| Mixing of the invisible Evil can be separated. [Ov. p.
74 41| of Freedom' separate this Evil, or will drugs and medicinal
75 41| If, therefore, this small Evil which is mingled with us
76 41| that mighty and powerful Evil which is mixed in Souls ?
77 41| separate from us even the Evil which we have mentioned
78 42| The proper cure for Evil if it is a poison.~If, therefore,
79 42| therefore, that deadly Evil is mixed in mankind like
80 42| and hurts ; so also when Evil is excessive in the Soul
81 42| nutriment, so they say that "Evil collects and increases in
82 42| therefore, the measure of the Evil of both kinds becomes excessive
83 43| Forgiveness is no cure for such Evil; much less vicarious forgiveness.~
84 43| therefore, who ought to expel Evil from mankind by a visible
85 44| can it subdue the Great Evil?~But I wish to know this :
86 44| the cause of sins, or is Evil the fountain of sins ? But
87 44| fountain of sins ? But if it is Evil as they say. free Volitions
88 44| block up the springs of Evil. By what method then is
89 44| what method then is the Evil made subject to our Will ?
90 44| our Freewill that great Evil about which they speak ?
91 44| which they speak ? If that Evil made itself subject to us,
92 44| the power of Good makes Evil subject to us, it is clear
93 44| therefore, even if that Evil is evil because it hurts
94 44| therefore, even if that Evil is evil because it hurts us, yet
95 44| yet that which permits Evil to destroy us is more evil
96 44| Evil to destroy us is more evil than it. ~
97 45| the fierce power of that Evil which possesses an Existence
98 45| those who are created ? But Evil does not possess an Existence
99 45| retains its hot nature, but Evil does not retain the nature
100 45| burns us. How then is that Evil, which is mixed in us, if
101 45| stronger than the wickedness of Evil ; and according to their
102 45| Teaching it is found that Evil is therefore accused by
103 45| proportion as it wishes, Evil opposes it. And in vain
104 45| hateful than Satan. But if Evil can injure our Freewill
105 45| they are calling Freewill Evil, though they not not aware
106 46| how can it conquer the Evil Element ?~But if they think "
107 46| Will is able to conquer Evil," let us then dismiss the
108 46| the injurious nature of Evil can be conquered. But if
109 46| how does that injurious Evil, since it is all mingled
110 46| granted them power over Evil to conquer it by means of
111 46| the power of conquering Evil, all their blasphemy applies
112 46| For if He thus changed Evil so that it might not injure
113 46| also able to change any Evil that injures us at present
114 46| their Freewill conquers Evil when it cannot conquer fire.
115 46| 55.] it is evident that Evil does not possess Freewill
116 47| can the Will lessen the evil Element except it is akin
117 47| except it is akin to the Evil ?~But if the injurious and
118 47| mitigated, how, seeing that Evil is an actual Existence,
119 47| love its opposite, how did Evil, as they say, conceive a
120 47| too, did Good mingle with Evil and love it ? And though
121 47| loves to bring forth the evil fruit of the bitter Root [
122 47| no good tree which yields evil fruit! [St. Matt, vii. 18.]
123 47| Nature, how does it bear the evil fruit of the 'deadly Body' ?
124 47| they say springs from an evil Element bear good conduct
125 48| For lo, when we will, the Evil in us may 'become lessened'
126 48| that when we lessen the Evil in us we do not mix anything
127 48| lessened. And when it (i.e., Evil) revives and rages we do
128 48| that it may rage except the evil Will. But if our Will lessens
129 48| that our Will is good and evil ? Therefore they are alluding
130 48| when they use all these evil terms, and they are uttering
131 49| For if our Will lessens Evil, that statement is conquered
132 49| conquered whereby they say that Evil is mixed with Good, and
133 49| end neither do Good and Evil. When, therefore, does the
134 49| there not also a removal of Evil by means of Evil so that
135 49| removal of Evil by means of Evil so that it may be sent down
136 50| thrust out the power of Evil.~But if they persist in
137 50| as by our Will we conquer Evil, and, therefore, instead
138 50| lessen the fierceness of Evil. For words do not lessen
139 50| Natures changed. For that Evil which exists independently,
140 50| can it vanquish the great Evil, seeing that a Power is
141 50| required in the case of Evil and Good, if they have '
142 51| Moral and physical Evil cannot come from a single
143 51| Will does not lessen the Evil which is mixed with bitter
144 51| Free-choice conquers this Evil of mankind, how can it be,
145 51| if it is the very same Evil which is in mankind and
146 51| part by the Will ? Either Evil is divided against itself,
147 51| collected in us' (and), if Evil is all one, how is part
148 51| mixtures of any use for the Evil which is in our Souls. And
149 51| cannot change it, and the Evil which is in our Souls belongs