bold = Main text
   Paragraph                            grey = Comment text

 1 3 |          impulse and thought for good things; and not only for
 2 3 |         things; and not only for good things, but we learn also
 3 3 |          of God, the fountain of good things, by means of Speech (
 4 3 |        and animals) forsakes the Good above him and degrades himself
 5 7 |   through the encouragement of a good hope, and not to fall under
 6 8 |        have been deprived of all good. For even if we could not
 7 9 |       astuteness which ministers good things, and our craftiness
 8 10|        sign that all those whose good things fail and are light
 9 13|          its importunity being a good instrument for (securing)
10 13|        instrument for (securing) good things. ~
11 16|                        It is not good for us to seek deep Knowledge :
12 20|      that part of it which loves good things, that the whole of
13 20|       the whole of it may become good like the part of it which
14 20|       the part of it which loves good things ? But if both these
15 20|        parts can be converted to Good or Evil, what shall we call
16 20|     impossible, for) they can be good,—that we should call them
17 20|         that we should call them good (is impossible, for) they
18 22|        Law an absurdity, or make Good akin to Evil.~But if the
19 22|          evil, and cannot become good, and if also the Good in
20 22|     become good, and if also the Good in us is good, and cannot
21 22|        if also the Good in us is good, and cannot become evil (
22 22|         become evil (then) these good and evil promises which
23 22|     cannot conquer ? But if that good thing which is in us is
24 22|       evil, how can we call that Good, seeing that it has a close
25 22|      also, that what they call a good Nature is, in virtue of
26 23|          is not right to scorn a good learner, let us now like
27 23|         one thing, part of it is good, and part of it evil ?"
28 24|        very wickedly against the Good One, the Giver of Freewill,
29 28|         say that Constituents of Good and Evil are mingled together
30 29|         comes from God, then the good and evil impulses which
31 30|        or if the Constituents of Good and Evil stir in the Will,
32 32|         His permission, receives good and evil impulses, and He
33 33|         single day so that he is good or evil, hateful or pleasing,
34 36|         say, the Constituents of Good and Evil overcome, and are
35 36|        to believe in a Mixing of Good and Evil, just as if they
36 37|        free Wills are changed to Good or Evil or let them admit
37 37|      they are 'bound Natures' of Good and Evil, they are Natures
38 38|         there are not Weights of Good and Evil conquering one
39 38|         can think even a hundred good thoughts. And if because
40 38|      there was at that time much Good in a man, his good thoughts
41 38|          much Good in a man, his good thoughts were numerous within,
42 38|         For directly after these good thoughts a man can think
43 38|    permit him to think all those good thoughts ? And if that Evil
44 38|       its own Will, that Evil is good, which has this good Will.
45 38|          is good, which has this good Will. For how did that Evil
46 38|    wished, finally conquered the Good, consent to give way before
47 38|         But if they say that the Good exceeded (in amount), in
48 38|         man's limbs, did all the Good hide itself, and make room
49 38| submitted to give way before the Good, the Evil is better than
50 38|          Evil is better than the Good, in that it took the crown
51 38|         its opponent. But if the Good consented to give place
52 38|         might be victorious, the Good is more evil than the Evil
53 39|      Weights and Constituents of Good and Evil neither outweigh
54 39|        become one Choice. For if good Choices spring up in us
55 39|         spring up in us from the good Root which is in us, and
56 40|         required to separate the good Will from the evil Will,
57 44|        Will. But if the power of Good makes Evil subject to us,
58 44|   whenever it hurts us that same Good stirs it up to hurt us.
59 45|         to blaspheme against the Good, but (this is said) in order
60 46|        Freewill ? But if another Good (Power) granted to Freewill
61 46|     censure is attached to that (Good One). For if He thus changed
62 47|           conceive a Passion for Good, and make an Assault on
63 47|      with it ? And how, too, did Good mingle with Evil and love
64 47|          it hates and denies the good Source of its Nature, and
65 47|           who says : there is no good tree which yields evil fruit! [
66 47|        18.] For if the Soul is a good thing from a good Nature,
67 47|      Soul is a good thing from a good Nature, how does it bear
68 47|        from an evil Element bear good conduct like good fruit ? ~
69 47|   Element bear good conduct like good fruit ? ~
70 48|        anything in it except the good Will alone, that it may
71 48|        to fools that our Will is good and evil ? Therefore they
72 48|       diluted wine and mixes his good. Will in it, can it acquire
73 49|          our Will comes from the Good, why is it not refined,
74 49|          that Evil is mixed with Good, and behold (they say) "
75 49|       and behold (they say) "the Good is refined little by little."
76 49|        come to an end neither do Good and Evil. When, therefore,
77 49|       there is a Refining of the Good by means of Good so that
78 49|          of the Good by means of Good so that it goes up from
79 50|       therefore, instead of 'the Good Words' which they teach
80 50|         they ought to distribute good Parts that mankind may eat
81 50|         or drink them that those good Parts may enter and lessen
82 50|      thrust out by means of some Good which also exists independently.
83 50|          in the case of Evil and Good, if they have 'bound Natures' ? ~