bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int          (5)  |     Spicilegium Solesmense, tom. i. p. 303 et seq.~ ~
 2   Int          (6)  |             Luteranos, Romae, 1557, p. 37 et seq.~ ~
 3   Int          (7)  |                               1 See p. 166, n. 1. ~ ~
 4   Int          (8)  |                               2 See p. 31.~ ~
 5   Int          (9)  | Magdeburgenses, Colon. 1573, ii. 3, p. 165; i. 5, p. 21, and ii.
 6   Int          (9)  |          1573, ii. 3, p. 165; i. 5, p. 21, and ii. 13, p, 208.~ ~
 7   Int          (9)  |            i. 5, p. 21, and ii. 13, p, 208.~ ~
 8   Int          (10) |          See Migne, Patr, Graec. X. p. 1343 et seq. His opinions
 9   Int          (10) |           Pitra, Spicil. Solesm. i. p. 545.~ ~
10   Int          (14) |             Theol. Lit. Zeit. 1877, p. 521 ; Zahn, Zeitschrift
11   Int          (14) |           Kirchengeschichte, B. ii. p. 450 et seq., 1878; Wagenmann,
12   Int          (14) |            Deutsche Theol. B. xxii. p. 141, 1878. On such authority,
13   Int          (15) |           1907 (vol. viii. No. 31), p. 404 et seq., Macarius Magnes,
14   Int          (15) |            1907 (vol. viii. No, 33, p. 546 et seq.).~ ~
15   Int          (20) |                               1 See p. 95, n. 2.~ ~
16   Int          (21) |            t. 3, No. 133, ap. Duch. p. 20.~ ~
17   Int          (23) |        Philostratus, Lipsiae, 1709, p. 459. a0fanisqh~nai fhsi\
18   Int          (26) |           see J.T.S. of April 1911, p. 377 et seq.~ ~
19   Int          (27) |              1 e.g. Apocr. iii. 30, p. 125, 1. 6, and iii. 36,
20   Int          (27) |             125, 1. 6, and iii. 36, p. 131, 1. 9. It is argued
21   Int          (30) |                     4 Apocr. iv. 3, p. 160, l. 6, and iv. 5, p.
22   Int          (30) |            p. 160, l. 6, and iv. 5, p. 163, l. 4.~ ~
23   Int          (31) |                    1 Apocr. ii. 15, p. 24. ~ ~
24   Int,        5     |           by Christomachi (iii. 14, p. 91), but they are further
25   Int          (34) |            see J.T.S. of July 1907, p. 553 et seq. See also below,
26   Int          (37) |                    3 Holl., Amphil. p. 91 et seq.~ ~
27   Int          (40) |           cit. ; cf. Apocr. iv. 16, p. 187, 1. 32.~ ~
28   Int          (41) |                   2 Apocr. iii. 16, p. 96, and iii. 24, p. 108
29   Int          (41) |             16, p. 96, and iii. 24, p. 108 et seq.~ ~
30   Int          (43) |            ap. Migne, Patr. Lat. v. p. 343) suggests that our
31   Int          (44) |                                   1 p. xv.~ ~
32   Int          (45) |                   2 Apocr. iii. 40, p. 138, 11. 21, 22~ ~
33   Int          (46) |           Ibid. v. 15, and iii. 43, p. 151~ ~
34   Int          (47) |                      4 Ibid. v. 17, p. 191, I. 17~ ~
35   Int          (48) |                      5 Ibid. ii. 8, p. 66, 1. 19.~ ~
36   Int          (50) |                      7 Ibid. v. 14, p. 182.~ ~
37   Int          (51) |                      8 Ibid. i. 17, p. 29, 1. 12.~ ~
38   Int          (56) |                 2 Patrologie, 1894, p. 550. ~ ~
39   Int          (58) |              1 e. g. Apocr. iv. 24, p. 204, 1. 21.~ ~
40   Int          (60) |          Daniel xii. 34) in iv. 12, p. 174, and refers to 2 Esdras
41   Int          (62) |             da-Mepharreshe, vol. i. p. 449.~ ~
42   Int,        8     |            is referred to in ii. 7, p. 6, when, in speaking of
43   Int          (64) |                4 Duchesne, op. cit. p. 37. Also D.C.B., art. "
44   Int          (66) |                               1 See p. 19, and J.T.S, of July
45   Int,        9     |           adds a piece of evidence (p. 112) which, if it is to
46   Int          (70) |                      1 See Introd., p. xviii.~ ~
47   Int,       10     |          punishment, and in iv. 16, p. 187, we find a second and
48   Int,       10     |          human affections" (iii. 8, p. 68), but other passages
49     I               |       Nicephorus, Spicil. Solesm. i p. 332.]~ ~CONCERNING Berenice,71
50     I          (71) |       Tischendorf, Evang. Apocryph. p. 277).~ ~
51     I          (75) |            of Malalas (ed. Dindorf, p. 329) says it was still
52    II          (77) |      connexion with it, see Introd. p. xv.~ ~
53    II          (82) |            the chapter. See Introd. p. xxiv.~ ~
54    II          (83) |           these words. See Introd., p. xviii.~ ~
55    II          (98) |         then present. See Introct., p. xvii.~ ~
56   III          (108)|     Plutarch and Diodorus (op. cit. p. 97).~ ~
57   III          (109)|            of Macarius in ch. viii. p. 66, 1. 19. See p. 55. That
58   III          (109)|             viii. p. 66, 1. 19. See p. 55. That his opponent regarded
59   III          (109)|         plain from Bk. iv. 25. (See p. 127.)~ ~
60   III          (115)|            1 a0paqh&j. Cp. II, xvi. p. 27.~ ~
61   III          (120)|          Amphilochius. See Introd., p. xix, for a discussion of
62   III          (127)|            Harnack does. (Op. cit., p. 36.)~ ~
63   III          (131)|            the Trinity. See Introd. p. xviii.~ ~
64   III          (151)|  Christomachi, for whom see Introd. p. xviii.~ ~
65   III          (155)|                       1 See note on p. 125~ ~
66   III          (177)|           begins. Harnack (op. cit. p. 103 et seq.) considers
67   III          (177)|           the second part 9+16 + x (p. 105 n. 1).~ ~
68   III          (189)|            discussion, see Introd., p. xvii.~ ~
69   III          (192)|       answer of Macarius (ch. xxix. p. 122, 1. 2, kai/per kaqhkeu&
70   III          (205)|            the next answer (ch. xl. p. 107, 11. 12-17).~ ~
71   III          (219)|          mentioned by Fabricius, v. p. 744. See Introd., p. xiv.,
72   III          (219)|             v. p. 744. See Introd., p. xiv., for the argument
73   III          (231)|    mentioning him (see also iv. 15, p. 128, 1. 24), which shows
74    IV          (246)|                      1 See Introd., p. xvii.~ ~
75    IV          (249)|             to Christ. See Introd., p. xv.~ ~
76    IV          (251)|            of writing. See Introd., p. xxi.~ ~
77    IV          (252)|         referred to in iii. 15 (see p. 79). Their name implies
78    IV          (253)|           be expected. See Introd., p. xxv. His very involved
79    IV          (256)|          Paul's wound, see Introd., p. xxvi.~ ~
80    IV          (258)|               1 See note on iii. I. p. 52.~ ~
81    IV          (262)|            similar list in iii. 43, p. 115, l. 16, where interesting
82    IV          (279)|            astronomer. See Introd., p. xxi,~ ~
83    IV          (289)|          Macarius. But see Introd., p. xviii. n. 3, and p. 155
84    IV          (289)|        Introd., p. xviii. n. 3, and p. 155 n. 1. The theory that
85    IV          (290)|             s Spicil. Solesm. t. I. p. 309 et seq. See Introd.,
86    IV          (302)|          them. Nicephorus (op. cit. p. 322) shows that Macarius
87    IV          (312)|      meaning "person." See Introd., p. xviii, and p. 142 n. I.~ ~
88    IV          (312)|          See Introd., p. xviii, and p. 142 n. I.~ ~
89    IV          (315)|                               1 See p. 125, n. 3.~ ~
90     V               |             Luteranos, Romae, 1557, p. 37.] 320~ ~The subject
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA2) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2010. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License