bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int               |         10 be reproducing in his book has generally been considered
 2   Int               |     Nothing more is heard of the book until 1867, when a Manuscript
 3   Int,        1     |      beginning in Chapter VII of Book II, and ending in the middle
 4   Int,        1     |         middle of Chapter XXX of Book IV. A fragment of Book I
 5   Int,        1     |        of Book IV. A fragment of Book I has been preserved in
 6   Int,        1     |        to discover a fragment of Book V in Turrianus.6 The questions
 7   Int,        1     |  Resurrection. The fragment from Book V suggests, that the latter
 8   Int,        1     |        faith.7 The method of the book is to give about seven objections
 9   Int,        1     |         at the beginning of each book.~ ~
10   Int,        2     |       APOCRITICUS TO 1867.~ ~The book seems to have disappeared
11   Int,        2     |          fragment from the first book, which has not been preserved
12   Int,        2     |    quotation from the lost fifth book. He gives the author's name
13   Int,        2     |    believe that there was such a book, and when search was made
14   Int,        2     |       Little is heard, about the book in the centuries that followed.
15   Int,        3     |       his opponent to Porphyry's book De Abstinentia as an authority.
16   Int,        5     |          he may have written his book years after the dialogue
17   Int,        5     |  unanimous in declaring that the book was written long afterwards,
18   Int,        5     |       though doubtless using the book into which Hierocles had
19   Int,        5     |      Trinitarian doctrine of the book has been considered as belonging
20   Int,        5     |        stasij and ou0si/a in the book ; and the whole passage
21   Int,        5     |          he was borrowing from a book of that name. But as a matter
22   Int,        6     |  Nicephorus, when he studied the book in the, ninth century,40
23   Int,        6     |         of him on the MS. of his book, in which he was robed as
24   Int,        6     |       the time that he wrote his book. As he makes no attempt
25   Int,        6     |        explain the fact that his book seems to have been unappreciated,
26   Int,        6     |        heathen objections in the book, namely, Porphyry and an
27   Int,        6     |       who made excerpts from his book and issued them in the form
28   Int,        7     |  fourteen are in six chapters of Book III. I prefer to think that
29   Int,        7     |          consider the opponent's book to have been "Philalethes,
30   Int,        7     |       said to have addressed his book "To the Christians, not
31   Int,        8     |         regard to the apocryphal book last mentioned, the fact
32   Int,        8     | Testament, Ephesians is the only book quoted which had not been
33   Int,       10     |  irrespective of chapters in the book. The only drawback to this
34     I               |                                  BOOK I~ ~[Lost, with the exception
35     I          (73) |         linking this fragment of Book I with the rest.~ ~
36    II               |                                  BOOK II~ ~[The Athens MS. does
37    II               |         set of objections in the Book is therefore lost Chapters
38    II          (82) |   alternative title of Macarius' book, appears here for the first
39   III               |                                  BOOK III~ ~Proem (introducing
40   III          (107)|        is the friend to whom the book is dedicated. In the Proem
41   III          (107)|       dedicated. In the Proem to Book IV he is said to have helped
42   III          (171)|         the few instances in his book of his passing over one
43   III          (177)|           He does not show why a book of excerpts from the fifteen
44   III          (177)|          beginning of the Second Book. As the beginning and end
45   III          (189)|          merely borrowing from a book, and himself turning it
46   III,     XLII     |     verify these things from the book "Concerning |111 the philosophy
47   III          (219)|                     1 This was a book by Porphyry, called peri/
48   III          (219)|      which the reference to this book affords, as against Harnack'
49    IV               |                                  BOOK IV~ ~Proem (introducing
50    IV          (235)|         dedication. Cf. Proem to Book III.~ ~
51    IV          (243)|     merely with the writing of a book.~ ~
52    IV          (265)|       reference to an Apocryphal book in the previous question,
53    IV          (270)|         words of that Apocryphal book, as quoted in the first
54    IV,      XVI     |        scroll." For the heavenly book of Christ's earthly life
55    IV          (281)|  chapters for the second time in Book IV.~ ~
56    IV          (286)|         Macarius was writing his book ; but on the face of it,
57    IV          (287)|        to the usual style of the book. In the latter case, it
58    IV          (304)|          as the sub-title of his book, it may only mean "by an
59     V               |                                  BOOK V~ ~[Fragment quoted in
60     V          (321)|      rqwma. Like the fragment of Book I., the language is here
61     V          (323)|       whereas the latter part of Book IV. leads us to expect objections