bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int               |           AN introduction to the Apocriticus of Macarius Magnes cannot
 2   Int               |       interesting and novel. The Apocriticus really presents us with
 3   Int               |         there is a danger of the Apocriticus again sinking into oblivion.
 4   Int,        1     |                THE NATURE OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~It may be stated at the
 5   Int,        2     |               THE HISTORY OF THE APOCRITICUS TO 1867.~ ~The book seems
 6   Int,        2     |         her healing.8 |12 ~ ~The Apocriticus next appears in the sixteenth
 7   Int,        3     |             In 1867 a MS. of the Apocriticus was discovered at Athens,
 8   Int,        3     |       admit that in any case the Apocriticus simply contains a series
 9   Int,        3     |          the solitary MS. of the Apocriticus in the National Library
10   Int,        3     |          is the sub-title of the Apocriticus, as a title of God the Son.
11   Int,        4     |        HEATHEN OBJECTIONS IN THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~Nowhere else does so
12   Int,        4     |      support by showing that the Apocriticus is really to be divided
13   Int,        4     |      problems connected with the Apocriticus which this theory helps
14   Int,        4     |       Again, we find that in the Apocriticus the life of Christ is belittled
15   Int          (23) |        a0fanh_j e0ge/neto of the Apocriticus.~ ~
16   Int,        4     |   language of theobjector in the Apocriticus has nothing in common with
17   Int,        4     |      than seven are found in the Apocriticus.26~ ~
18   Int,        5     |                  THE DATE OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~Upon the date of Macarius
19   Int,        5     |       words and arguments of the Apocriticus to some of the fathers of
20   Int,        5     |         alternative title of the Apocriticus itself, and probably was
21   Int,        6     |            THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~In spite of the ambiguity
22   Int,        6     |     brought by the author of the Apocriticus, who is himself steeped
23   Int,        6     |       not in Asia Minor that the Apocriticus was written. It is not only
24   Int,        6     |        is so plainly seen in the Apocriticus, is very doubtful.~ ~It
25   Int,        7     |      transposed as "Monogenes or Apocriticus to the Greeks," and this
26   Int,        7     |      first part of the title was Apocriticus, as given in the MS., and
27   Int,        8     |        LITERARY RELATIONS OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~This part of the subject
28   Int,        8     |      have used it in writing his Apocriticus.65 But it is with the writers
29   Int,        8     |          the indebtedness of the Apocriticus to its literature which
30   Int,        9     |         THE TEXT AND MSS. OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~We do not now know the
31   Int,        9     |    uncertain.~ ~This side of the Apocriticus was discussed at length
32   Int,        9     |         of the five books of the Apocriticus (and even they are mutilated
33   Int,        9     |    oftenest-cited passage in the Apocriticus. At the end of it they add
34   Int,       10     |          APOLOGETIC VALUE OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~We may set aside the
35   Int,       10     |     obscurity, I believe the |30 Apocriticus to rank as one of the great
36   Int,       10     |        who know something of the Apocriticus will be induced to study
37   III          (121)|         alternative title of the Apocriticus, In this same answer Christ
38   III          (152)|         alternative title of the Apocriticus, occurs four times in a
39    IV          (235)|         to whom he dedicated the Apocriticus, as well as his supporter
40    IV          (259)|         for the late date of the Apocriticus. But as early as A. D. 290
41     V               | reproducing the substance of the Apocriticus in the words that follow. (
42     V          (323)|         us that the scope of the Apocriticus was wider than is supposed