bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int,        5     |            is true that there is a passage on the baptismal formula
 2   Int,        5     |           the book ; and the whole passage is contained in twenty-three
 3   Int,        5     |       close parallel is found in a passage of Rufinus,36 and another
 4   Int,        9     |        familiar and oftenest-cited passage in the Apocriticus. At the
 5   Int,        9     |      suggestion with regard to the passage about the Trinity, where
 6   Int,        9     |            one to interpolate, the passage on Baptism |29 in the name
 7   Int,       10     |           anything Docetic. In one passage (iii. 14) he speaks of His
 8   Int,       10     |          very definite Trinitarian passage in iv. 25.~ ~With regard
 9    II          (80) |                             4 This passage scarcely justifies the argument
10    II,     XIII     |        will be proved from another passage that the accounts of his
11    II,    XVIII     |               Pray do not let that passage trouble you either, in that
12   III          (131)|         ou0si/a for "nature." This passage naturally has some bearing
13   III,     XIII     | interpretation is supported by the passage about Elijah. His translation
14   III,    XXIII     |          plain the question of the passage, I will reveal to you the
15   III,      XVI     |      consider in detail that other passage, where He says, "Such signs
16   III,    XVIII     |        more so, because there is a passage of Scripture somewhere which
17   III,       XX     |         from the statement in that passage where Jesus said to him, "
18   III          (185)|      unfair thus to imply that one passage follows after the other.
19   III,     XXIX     |          lurks anywhere some other passage of the New Testament that
20   III          (208)|         but can scarcely have that passage in mind, for it decides
21   III,     XLII     |           the full meaning of this passage, we will deal with the rest,
22   III,    XLIII     |          should be saved." In this passage (from 1 Corinthians) about
23   III          (224)|            Tim. iv. 2. This is the passage quoted in the objection,
24    IV          (236)|            of the words, as in the passage qa&rsei to&nde g' a1eqlon (
25    IV          (273)|                   2 This excellent passage well carries on the simile
26    IV          (275)|       forced interpretation of the passage in Matt. xxiv. 35.~ ~
27    IV          (287)|                              1 The passage which begins here, and continues
28    IV          (289)|             1. The theory that the passage is a later interpolation
29    IV          (292)|     attention of Nicephorus to the passage. For it is on the question
30    IV          (297)|          Qeo&j, not qeo&j, in this passage.~ ~
31    IV          (305)|                              1 The passage beginning with the mention
32    IV          (312)|        stasin e0xari/sato ;). This passage is an example of the fact