bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int               |      Neoplatonist of the third century, the reproduction of them
 2   Int               |       controversy in the ninth century, after which there is no
 3   Int,        2     |    disappeared until the ninth century. This is not to be wondered
 4   Int,        2     |       appears in the sixteenth century, when it was one of the
 5   Int,        2     |        beginning of the fourth century. He held that neither of
 6   Int,        3     |       the work from the fourth century, and identified the author
 7   Int,        5     |        beginning of the fourth century, though he may have written
 8   Int,        5     |        Christian and heathen a century later for the edification
 9   Int,        5     |   before the end of the fourth century.~ ~4. He also has a list
10   Int,        5     |      the fathers of the fourth century, notably Gregory of Nyssa.
11   Int,        5     |     ideas common in the fourth century, so that the theory that
12   Int,        5     |    that it is quite possibly a century earlier. Of course this
13   Int,        6     | studied the book in the, ninth century,40 but it is obvious to
14   Int,        6     |  flourishing during the fourth century. His allegorical method
15   Int,        6     |       to be found in the ninth century possibly owing its preservation
16   Int,        6     |     first decade of the fourth century, or at a later period, is
17   Int,        6     |        not far into the fourth century, in which he faced, probably
18   Int,        6     |      the great fathers of that century. His work was seized upon
19   Int,        8     |       into Latin in the fourth century, so it may well have been
20   Int,        8     |      the writers of the fourth century that most similarities have
21   Int,        8     |      the work to the following century. There is no doubt that
22   Int,        9     |   disappeared in the sixteenth century, was fortunately collated
23   Int,        9     |     paper MS. of the fifteenth century, and is described by Duchesne
24    II          (80) |      latter part of the fourth century. For there is no actual
25    IV          (242)|        beginning of the fourth century. Does it suggest that the
26    IV          (250)|       early part of the fourth century. To speak thus is therefore