bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int,        4     |           added that, whereas the language of theobjector in the Apocriticus
 2   Int,        5     |         not in the least like the language of Christians who faced
 3   Int,        5     |  substantiated. For instance, the language of Macarius about our Lord
 4   Int,        6     |      reason for thinking that his language is merely part of a literary
 5   Int,       10     |           the Passion, but if his language is heretical, he is following
 6    II,     XVII     |      estimates the divergences of language. For instance, if some one
 7    II,     XVII     |         does not lay claim to the language of freedom, and has not
 8    II,     XVII     |          or said, even though the language be barbarian. And you yourself
 9    II,     XVII     |         action with cleverness of language, but rather to preserve
10    II,       XV     |            That is plain from the language, for that which is "cast
11    II,       XX     |         and powers, etc. Inspired language similarly uses whole for
12   III          (108)|           simpler and more direct language. The diction is, however,
13   III          (157)|      thtoj. This can mean "in the language of simplicity," for it is
14   III          (157)|         see the reference to "the language of antiquity." Is it "by
15   III          (180)|           of exegesis, and of the language of the Epistles.~ ~
16   III          (214)|           answer is given, as its language is curious and interesting.~ ~
17   III,    XXXVI     |           arms against him by his language. But if you are possessed
18   III,    XLIII     |           by the splendour of his language, saying again and again
19    IV          (255)|           iii. 22 he uses similar language about S. Peter's crucifixion,
20    IV,      XIX     | addressing the Greeks in measured language, saying, 'Stay, ye Argives;
21    IV,      XXV     |           importing such terrible language into his questionings, seemed
22    IV          (300)|          scarcely sounds like the language of the objector, but a subject
23    IV,      XXX     |          and not with any flowery language which might deceive, like
24     V          (321)|          fragment of Book I., the language is here linked with that
25     V          (323)|           Macarian, and so is the language. His favourite word kato&
Best viewed with any browser at 800x600 or 768x1024 on Tablet PC
IntraText® (VA2) - Some rights reserved by EuloTech SRL - 1996-2010. Content in this page is licensed under a Creative Commons License