bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int               |          that the author's name, date, and country have always
 2   Int,        2     |         Magnetes, and places his date soon after A.D. 150. His
 3   Int,        3     |        near Edessa, giving him a date between A.D. 300 and 350.
 4   Int,        3     |      German critics14 refused to date the work from the fourth
 5   Int,        3     |    accepts the theory of a later date, and puts aside my arguments
 6   Int,        5     |                              THE DATE OF THE APOCRITICUS.~ ~Upon
 7   Int,        5     |          APOCRITICUS.~ ~Upon the date of Macarius depends the
 8   Int,        5     |       considerations make such a date impossible, there is a strong
 9   Int,        5     |         suggested indications of date may now be added.~ ~1. Twice
10   Int,        5     |          the other direction the date is limited by the statement
11   Int,        5     |        further discussion of the date, I must refer to what I
12   Int,        9     |       mere insertion, of a later date than Macarius. Perhaps some
13   Int,       10     |        Moses, he accepts a later date without any weakening of
14   III          (120)|       the bearing of this on the date of Macarius.~ ~
15    IV          (242)|       the answer was of the same date ?~ ~
16    IV          (259)|         an argument for the late date of the Apocriticus. But
17    IV          (287)|          reconcile with an early date for Macarius. See Introd.,
18    IV          (289)|         critics to assign a late date to Macarius. But see Introd.,
19    IV          (299)| believing that the philosopher's date is earlier.~ ~