Paragraph

 1 1      |       grant – legal recognition to homosexual unions, which may include
 2 1(1)   |            on the pastoral care of homosexual persons (October 1, 1986);
 3 1(1)   |          the non-discrimination of homosexual persons (July 24, 1992);
 4 1(1)   |      European Parliament regarding homosexual couples (March 25, 1994);
 5 4      |            grounds for considering homosexual unions to be in any way
 6 4      |            Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural
 7 4      |     against the natural moral law. Homosexual acts “close the sexual act
 8 4      |          Sacred Scripture condemns homosexual acts “as a serious depravity... (
 9 4      |            attest to the fact that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered”.5
10 4      |         Church, men and women with homosexual tendencies “must be accepted
11 4(7)   |            on the pastoral care of homosexual persons (October 1, 1986),
12 4      |           virtue of chastity.8 The homosexual inclination is however “
13 4(8)   |            on the pastoral care of homosexual persons (October 1, 1986),
14 4      |       objectively disordered”9 and homosexual practices are “sins gravely
15 [Title]|        POSITIONS ON THE PROBLEM~OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
16 5      |             Faced with the fact of homosexual unions, civil authorities
17 5      |          cases, they favour giving homosexual unions legal equivalence
18 5      |      explicit legal recognition of homosexual unions, it is necessary
19 5      |   contradicted both by approval of homosexual acts and unjust discrimination
20 5      |      unjust discrimination against homosexual persons. Therefore, discreet
21 5      |     specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded
22 5      |          In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally
23 [Title]|       AGAINST LEGAL~RECOGNITION OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
24 6      |        oppose legal recognition of homosexual unions, ethical considerations
25 6      |        person.13 Laws in favour of homosexual unions are contrary to right
26 6      |          on the difference between homosexual behaviour as a private phenomenon
27 6      |    behaviour. Legal recognition of homosexual unions would obscure certain
28 7      |                                 7. Homosexual unions are totally lacking
29 7      |          to alter this inadequacy.~Homosexual unions are also totally
30 8      |            of legal recognition of homosexual unions would be the redefinition
31 8      |            common good. By putting homosexual unions on a legal plane
32 8      |       support legal recognition of homosexual unions. Differentiating
33 8      |          remote analogous sense do homosexual unions fulfil the purpose
34 9      |         institutional recognition. Homosexual unions, on the other hand,
35 9      |         which legal recognition of homosexual unions is necessary to avoid
36 9      |     situations in which cohabiting homosexual persons, simply because
37 9(17)  |          encourage a person with a homosexual orientation to declare his
38 9(17)  |          the non-discrimination of homosexual persons [July 24, 1992],
39 [Title]|           LEGISLATION IN FAVOUR~OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
40 10     |           the legal recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians
41 10     | legislative proposals in favour of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians
42 10     |       favour of the recognition of homosexual unions is proposed for the
43 10     |       favour of the recognition of homosexual unions is already in force,
44 11     |           teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any
45 11     |          in any way to approval of homosexual behaviour or to legal recognition
46 11     |            to legal recognition of homosexual unions. The common good
47 11     |      society. Legal recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on