Paragraph

 1 1      |     recognition to homosexual unions, which may include the possibility
 2 1(1)   |       marriage and “de facto” unions (July 26, 2000), 23.~
 3 4      |    for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar
 4 [Title]|     THE PROBLEM~OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
 5 5      |   with the fact of homosexual unions, civil authorities adopt
 6 5      |     legal recognition of such unions, under the pretext of avoiding,
 7 5      |      favour giving homosexual unions legal equivalence to marriage
 8 5      |     recognition of homosexual unions, it is necessary to distinguish
 9 5      |       immoral nature of these unions; reminding the government
10 5      |   situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized
11 [Title]|     RECOGNITION OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
12 6      |     recognition of homosexual unions, ethical considerations
13 6      |       in favour of homosexual unions are contrary to right reason
14 6      |       granted to marriage, to unions between persons of the same
15 6      |  grant legal standing to such unions without failing in its duty
16 6      |     recognition of homosexual unions would obscure certain basic
17 7      |                 7. Homosexual unions are totally lacking in the
18 7      |       legal recognition. Such unions are not able to contribute
19 7      |   this inadequacy.~Homosexual unions are also totally lacking
20 7      |      complementarity in these unions creates obstacles in the
21 7      |     by persons living in such unions would actually mean doing
22 8      |     recognition of homosexual unions would be the redefinition
23 8      |   good. By putting homosexual unions on a legal plane analogous
24 8      |     recognition of homosexual unions. Differentiating between
25 8      | analogous sense do homosexual unions fulfil the purpose for which
26 8      | reasons for holding that such unions are harmful to the proper
27 9      |       recognition. Homosexual unions, on the other hand, do not
28 9      |     recognition of homosexual unions is necessary to avoid situations
29 [Title]|       IN FAVOUR~OF HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS~
30 10     |     recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are
31 10     |       in favour of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are
32 10     |     recognition of homosexual unions is proposed for the first
33 10     |     recognition of homosexual unions is already in force, the
34 11     |     recognition of homosexual unions. The common good requires
35 11     |     recognition of homosexual unions or placing them on the same