Book,  Part, Title, Chapter, Can.

 1 Intr                      |         Church,~especially as it is proposed by the teaching of the Second
 2 Intr                      |             faithful to observe the proposed legislation with~a sincere
 3 Intr                      |         undertook this task when he proposed to collect and reform all~
 4 Intr                      |  organization of the new Code to be~proposed to the synod of bishops
 5 Intr                      | consultative organs and persons who proposed~them), but especially to
 6 Intr                      |          flowing from it which were proposed~at the very outset of the
 7 Intr                      |          well as of~other questions proposed at the request of at least
 8    1,   0,    4,   3,   62|            rescript if not even~one proposed motivating reason is true.~§
 9    1,   0,    9,   1,  158|          therefore, a person who is proposed for~presentation and questioned
10    2,   2,    0,   1,  339|           council. To the questions proposed by the Roman Pontiff, the
11    2,   2,    1,   2,  378|             called the ternus to be proposed to the Apostolic See, the
12    2,   2,    3,   1,  466|                         Can.465 All proposed questions are subject to
13    2,   2,    3,   6,  549|         pastor regularly concerning proposed and existing pastoral endeavors~
14    2,   3,    2,   4,  663|             the following of Christ proposed in the gospel and expressed~
15    3,   0,    0,   0,  751|        Church, and at the same time proposed~as divinely revealed either
16    3,   0,    0,   0,  751|            and every thing which is proposed definitively by the magisterium
17    3,   0,    4,   0,  831|           faith and morals as it is proposed by the ecclesiastical magisterium.~§
18    5,   0,    3,   0, 1287|           goods whose alienation is~proposed falls within the minimum
19    5,   0,    3,   0, 1287|      juridic person whose goods are proposed~for alienation and of previous
20    7,   1,    3,   2, 1456|        manner of the trial, must be proposed before the joinder of the
21    7,   1,    3,   2, 1457|         1460 §1. If an exception is proposed against the competence of
22    7,   1,    3,   2, 1459|        called litis finitae~must be proposed and adjudicated before the
23    7,   1,    3,   2, 1459|     peremptory exceptions are to be proposed during the joinder of the
24    7,   1,    3,   2, 1460|             Counterclaims cannot be proposed validly except within thirty
25    7,   2,    5,   0, 1584|             citation, a question is proposed~which nevertheless pertains
26    7,   2,    5,   0, 1585|          1588 An incidental case is proposed in writing or orally before
27    7,   2,    5,   0, 1586|          expeditissime) whether the proposed incidental question seems
28    7,   2,    7,   0, 1610|                 Can. 1613 The rules proposed above for a definitive sentence
29    7,   2,    8,   1, 1618|       mentioned in can. 1620 can be proposed by way of exception in perpetuity
30    7,   2,    8,   1, 1620|       mentioned in can. 1622 can be proposed within three months from~
31    7,   2,    8,   1, 1622|         complaint of nullity can be proposed together with an appeal
32    7,   2,    9,   1, 1641|             of thirty days from the proposed challenge. Within a month
33    7,   2,   11,   0, 1647|          and, if an appeal has been proposed, also the appellate judge
34    7,   3,    1,   1, 1683|          After receiving a petition proposed according to the norm of
35    7,   3,    1,   2, 1690|          been used and an appeal is proposed, the tribunal of second
36    7,   3,    1,   3, 1696|            well~founded.~§2. If the proposed case has special difficulties
37    7,   3,    3,   0, 1713|           the same~challenge can be proposed in the canonical forum before
38    7,   4,    0,   3, 1726|          trial; if both appeals are proposed, although by different parties,
39    7,   4,    0,   3, 1727|             is pending because of a proposed challenge or the accused
40    7,   6,    0,   0, 1730|       elapsed. If~recourse has been proposed against a decree, however,
41    7,   6,    0,   0, 1731|       author. When this petition is proposed, by that very fact suspension
42    7,   6,    0,   0, 1731|          not valid:~1/ for recourse proposed to a bishop against decrees
43    7,   6,    0,   0, 1731|             to him;~2/ for recourse proposed against a decree which decides
44    7,   6,    0,   0, 1731|           decision;~3/ for recourse proposed according to the norm of
45    7,   6,    0,   0, 1733|          norm of §2 and recourse is proposed~afterwards, the person who
46    7,   6,    0,   0, 1733|      revoked.~§4. If no recourse is proposed against the decree within
47    7,   6,    0,   0, 1734|         decree. The recourse can be proposed before the author of the~
48    7,   6,    0,   0, 1734|      superior.~§2. Recourse must be proposed within the peremptory time