Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library |
Code of Canon Law IntraText CT - Text |
CHAPTER II. The Tribunal of Second Instance
Can. 1438 Without prejudice to the prescript of can. 1444, §1, n. 1:
1/ from the tribunal of a suffragan bishop, appeal is made to the metropolitan tribunal, without prejudice to
2/ in cases tried in first instance before the metropolitan, appeal is made to the tribunal which the metropolitan
has designated in a stable manner with the approval of the Apostolic See;
3/ for cases tried before a provincial superior, the tribunal of second instance is under the authority of the
supreme moderator; for cases tried before the local abbot, the tribunal of second instance is under the authority of
the abbot superior of the monastic congregation.
Can. 1439 §1. If a single tribunal of first instance has been established for several dioceses according to the norm of
Can. 1423, the conference of bishops must establish a tribunal of second instance with the approval of the Apostolic
See unless the dioceses are all suffragan of the same archdiocese.
§2. With the approval of the Apostolic See, a conference of bishops can establish one or more tribunals of
second instance in addition to the cases mentioned in §1.
§3. Over the tribunals of second instance mentioned in §§1–2, the conference of bishops or the bishop it
designates has all the powers which a diocesan bishop has over his own tribunal.
Can. 1440 If competence by reason of grade according to the norm of cann. 1438 and 1439 is not observed, the
incompetence of the judge is absolute.
Can. 1441 The tribunal of second instance must be established in the same way as the tribunal of first instance.
Nevertheless, if a single judge rendered a sentence in the first instance of the trial according to can. 1425, §4, the
tribunal of second instance is to proceed collegially.