Paragraph

 1 2 |     both councils together with two of the preceding century,
 2 3 |        attendant circumstances, two points arise and stand out,
 3 4 |      maintained that there were two persons in Christ, fell
 4 5 |          Eutyches asserted that two moments of time should be
 5 5 |      the Incarnation there were two natures in Christ, the human
 6 6 |         from the coalescence of two; for there is no way in
 7 6 |        there is no way in which two true and distinct natures
 8 8 |       of the one person and the two natures in Christ could
 9 9 |     they brought to the council two epistles, one addressed
10 13|         of the East, except for two exiles from Africa. ~
11 20|    confess that our Lord was of two natures before their union;
12 20| impiously described as being of two natures before the Incarnation
13 23|     definition likewise defines two distinct natures and one
14 23|         pretend that there were two natures in the Lord before
15 23|       the Only Begotten, having two natures without confusion,
16 23|        sundered or divided into two persons, but is one and
17 25|         they treated the latter two names as totally different
18 25|        meaning, from the former two. Their approach, on the
19 27|        Nor do we refuse to say "two Natures", provided there
20 31|        rules out the placing of two individuals in Christ, as
21 34|        the other in time; these two have met in unity and can
22 35|      that of the Word, in which two natures entirely distinct
23 37|   person meet without confusion two distinct natures, the divine
24 44|        that there are in Christ two true and perfect natures,