Paragraph

 1 5 |     Incarnation there were two natures in Christ, the human and
 2 6 |    which two true and distinct natures can be reduced to one, and
 3 8 |     the one person and the two natures in Christ could never be
 4 20|       that our Lord was of two natures before their union; after
 5 20|      described as being of two natures before the Incarnation and,
 6 20|        only one person in both natures, that the Son of God took
 7 21| addition to the distinction of natures in Christ, there is clearly
 8 22|      firm foundation that both natures subsist by the One Person
 9 23|  likewise defines two distinct natures and one person in Christ
10 23|    pretend that there were two natures in the Lord before the union,
11 23|      Only Begotten, having two natures without confusion, change,
12 23|        distinction between the natures was not removed by the union,
13 25|  Eutyches about the mixture of natures in Christ, they obstinately
14 27|       do we refuse to say "two Natures", provided there is no implication
15 31|      clearly asserts that both natures are united in 'One Person
16 35|      of the Word, in which two natures entirely distinct from each
17 37| without confusion two distinct natures, the divine and the human.
18 44|    Christ two true and perfect natures, the divine and the human,