Paragraph

 1 4 |      of Constantinople. This man, in refuting the Nestorian
 2 5 |                   5. 'A rash man and quite unskilled' (St.
 3 9 |   bishop of Alexandria. This man, who as both a friend to
 4 22|     God and truly the Son of Man' (Ep. xxviii, 4. PL. liv,
 5 23|  humanity, true God and true man, made of a rational soul
 6 29| entire and perfect nature of man' - thus grandly St. Leo
 7 31|    in Christ, as if some one man, completely autonomous in
 8 32|     same [Christ] the Son of Man, divine attributes. ~
 9 33|     of the person of God and man. For the Son of God came
10 33| human nature, but the Son of Man ascended according to his
11 33|     who came down and Son of Man who went up' (St. Thomas,
12 34| deigned to become the Son of Man, so that being God smoúsios
13 34| person] should exist as true man consubstantial with his